Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

A Palestinian Hamas militant takes part in a military show in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip May 29, 2014. (IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA/REUTERS)
A Palestinian Hamas militant takes part in a military show in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip May 29, 2014. (IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA/REUTERS)

Has Hamas changed its stripes? New unity government with PLO takes shape Add to ...

Hamas has been the bane of Israel’s existence almost since its inception in 1988, in the early days of the Palestinian uprising known as the intifada, when the Islamic Resistance Movement first sent young men into the streets to throw rocks at the tanks of Israel’s occupying army.

The Islamic movement that preceded Hamas’s creation had enjoyed a certain amount of support from Israel’s occupation authorities, who preferred to see Palestinian youths drawn to mosques rather than the militant Palestine Liberation Organization of Yasser Arafat. But the almost spontaneous outbreak of the intifada in December, 1987, ignited a fire under young Palestinians, especially in Gaza, and the Islamic movement felt compelled to respond with the creation of a new, more militant organization.

An offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas graduated from rocks to guns and then to bombs, directed at first at Israeli forces and settlers in the occupied territories. In the wake of the PLO’s recognition of Israel in late 1993 (considered to be treason by Hamas) and 40 days after a settler’s deadly attack on a room full of Muslims at prayer in Hebron in early 1994, Hamas launched a wave of suicide bomb attacks on civilians inside Israel, striking at buses, restaurants and bus stops. Attacks grew more frequent and deadly during the second intifada of 2000 to 2005, as pizza parlours, nightclubs and hotel dining rooms were targeted.

This is the image of Hamas that most Israelis still retain, even though a new leader, Khaled Meshaal, called a halt to the practice of suicide bombings in 2005.

Little wonder then that the news in late April of reconciliation between Hamas and its rival, the PLO, garnered a chilly reception from Israelis. When PLO leader and Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas announced the two factions would agree on a government of national unity to be followed by elections in which all parties could run, the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suspended peace talks with the PLO.

Hamas rejected the PLO’s 1993 Oslo Accord with Israel and, since 2007, when the parties’ militias fought a brief but deadly battle in Gaza, the PLO has controlled the West Bank while Hamas ruled the Gaza Strip – and Israel liked it that way. By dividing the Palestinians, it could negotiate with Mr. Abbas, even as it allowed its West Bank settlements to expand, while keeping the more militant Hamas locked up in Gaza. The Islamic organization’s use of rockets that targeted (but seldom hit) the civilian Israeli population in the south justified Israel’s continued get-tough policy.

Things are changing. Mr. Abbas announced Thursday that the current prime minister of the Palestinian Authority, Rami Hamdallah, would serve as prime minister of a national unity government, and that the membership of the new cabinet would be announced shortly. Mr. Hamdallah, it seems, was acceptable to both Hamas and the PLO, though officials said the two parties disagreed on who would serve in the important post of foreign minister. Hamas party leader Ismail Haniyeh, who had been elected by Palestinians as prime minister in January, 2006, but ended up only serving in that role in Gaza, has been offered the influential position of speaker of the legislative council.

Mr. Abbas has trumpeted these new developments as evidence that he speaks for all Palestinians and, on their behalf, would like to continue peace talks with Israel. His partner Hamas does not object.

Israel shudders at the thought. “Peace with us, or pact with Hamas,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. “You can’t have both.”

Critics cite Hamas’s failure to agree even to the minimal requirements of the Quartet as evidence that the organization is no partner for peace. The Quartet of the United States, European Union, United Nations and Russia has stated that Hamas must recognize Israel, renounce violent resistance and accept agreements with Israel signed by the PLO if it wants to be accepted.

People such as former Mossad director Ephraim Halevy and former Shin Bet chief Ami Ayalon have said for years that it is necessary and appropriate to talk to Hamas, and that renouncing violence is the only requirement that matters. The Israeli government, however, remains staunchly opposed.

Mr. Abbas argues that by entering into this unity pact and agreeing on a new unity government, Hamas is endorsing the peace process and accepting the Quartet’s conditions.

Has Hamas renounced violence?

No, certainly not yet, and it retains its militia, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, numbering about 7,000 in Gaza, along with its weapons. “The al-Qassam Brigades’ weaponry is of national importance to confront the occupation,” said Mousa Abu Marzouk, Hamas’s second-in-command. “Hamas’s position in this regard is clear, and it will not allow any tampering with the brigades’ armament, under any circumstances.”

Report Typo/Error
Single page

Follow on Twitter: @globepmartin

Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular