Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The 1987 publication of The Closing of the American Mind, by philosopher Allan Bloom, marked a watershed moment in the culture wars in its description of the then-emerging climate on U.S. university campuses, where age-old methods of open-ended inquiry had fallen out of favour.

Instead of reading the classics in philosophy, literature and politics – which had for centuries been how universities formed critical thinkers – Prof. Bloom argued that liberal arts students were being encouraged to define truth as they saw it without adequate rigour for such a task.

The title of Prof. Bloom’s book was ironic. The abandoning of centuries-old texts, beyond summary descriptions, had led to a narrowing of viewpoints and a form of groupthink on campus. The world was defined in Manichean binaries – kind of like in the Middle Ages.

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Bloom’s book was dismissed by many critics as a conservative diatribe, though it did become a bestseller and struck a chord with many in academia who identified with his diagnosis. The truth is that that Prof. Bloom, who died in 1992, was anything but a reactionary. His main point was simply that, to truly become a free thinker, you need to do your homework.

It is not hard to trace a straight line between the climate Prof. Bloom described in 1987 and the current crisis in higher education. Universities are now places where free thinking goes to die. Cancel culture has replaced open debate. Safe spaces and trigger warnings coddle young minds, sparing them from considering uncomfortable or opposing points of view or realities.

The intellectually claustrophobic environment on university campuses has for many years left newsrooms as the last bastion of open inquiry. I chose journalism as a career 30 years ago because it allowed me to indulge a curious mind and engage in lifelong learning without having to pay tuition fees. I did not know what “truth” I believed back then. But I did believe that an honest reporter did not begin his or her reporting by writing the headline first.

I also knew that the opinion pages of any newspaper played a critical role in advancing debates about what kind of society we wanted to live in. By necessity, the op-ed pages had to be forums where diverse and controversial opinions could be expressed without fear of censorship or reprisal against those who dared go against the groupthink du jour.

That is why recent developments at The New York Times have been so frightening for those of us who have long admired that newspaper as a beacon of free thought and open inquiry. Yes, its editorial page has mostly reflected the particular viewpoints of its owners or the U.S. liberal intellectual elite. But the paper’s embrace of cancel culture has left a once-model journalistic institution indulging in the same lazy righteousness it used to denounce.

This week, writer and editor Bari Weiss resigned from her job at the Times in the wake of what she claimed had been “constant bullying” by colleagues who did not like her views or those she sought to feature among the otherwise overwhelming woke voices that now dominate the paper’s news and editorial pages. “A new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this newspaper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose jobs it is to inform everyone else.” She deplored that the Times’ news agenda is now dictated by debates on Twitter, where woke views run wild.

Ms. Weiss’s resignation followed that of opinion editor James Bennet, who left in June after a newsroom revolt over an op-ed by Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton. The piece called for federal troops to be dispatched to U.S. cities to stop violence and looting that had erupted alongside peaceful protests denouncing the police killing of George Floyd. The Times later concluded that the op-ed “fell short of our standards and should not have been published.”

Story continues below advertisement

Regardless of what you thought of Sen. Cotton’s piece – I thought it was needlessly confrontational and jumped to the wrong conclusions – it offered Times readers a perspective on the Black Lives Matter protests held by millions of Americans and one that any engaged citizen should know about and attempt to understand. Yes, it used a few loaded terms to convey a political message. But not any more so than the average Times op-ed, only from a different standpoint.

Many people cheered Mr. Bennet’s departure as a victory in a step toward the abandonment of “both sides” journalism in favour of an approach that proceeds from the basic premise that the United States is a racist country whose institutions exist only to perpetuate systemic racism.

Such an approach would not just stifle the truth, rather than reveal it. It would nail the American mind shut.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies