Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Wesley Wark is a visiting research professor at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa.

The U.S. government has revealed more of its hand in its looming legal battle against the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei. Two separate U.S. grand jury indictments against the company were unsealed on Monday, alleging criminal misconduct on the part of Huawei and its leadership.

Like it or not, this legal conflict has become a high-stakes geopolitical battle for Canada, because of our arrest of executive Meng Wanzhou, who faces extradition to the United States. Canada-Chinese relations have suffered greatly, and two Canadians have been arbitrarily detained in China in an exercise of “hostage diplomacy.”

Story continues below advertisement

The U.S. indictments are likely only to mire Canada even more deeply in the Huawei crisis.

One indictments, issued in Seattle, involves a case of alleged corporate espionage on behalf of a U.S. Huawei subsidiary against T-Mobile, a domestic rival. The alleged activities involved an effort on the part of Huawei to clandestinely acquire and reverse-engineer technology from a robotic phone-testing device with the happy name of “Tappy.”

Corporate espionage against a commercial competitor is bad, if it’s true – but is it worthy of state intervention and a global clash?

The second grand-jury indictment is more telling. This one comes out of the Court of the Eastern District of New York, a heavy hitter, and directly implicates Ms. Meng, alleging Huawei was engaged in deceitful financial practices and sanctions-busting through the operations of a subsidiary in Iran called Skycom. This, at its heart, is a bank-fraud case. The allegation is that Huawei executives, including Ms. Meng, misled U.S. banks about its activities in Iran, thereby putting them in peril of violating its own country’s laws around the Iranian sanctions regime. The scale of the offence is far from clear, however: Only Count 7, a conspiracy charge, provides details of the actual financial transactions by a Huawei subsidiary in Iran made through U.S. banks in potential violation of U.S. laws. The total comes to $313,961.67. That looks like small potatoes.

Illegal activity or poor normative behavior should not be condoned. But these indictments make it starkly clear the U.S. government has had Huawei in its sights for many years, and is now determined to wage an aggressive campaign against it. The United States’ anti-Huawei push has broad bipartisan support, and is in line with U.S. intelligence pronouncements on the threat posed by China; as expected, the Chinese government has reacted to the indictments with outrage, calling them ”unfair and immoral.”

The Huawei campaign reflects Washington’s fears of China’s drive to global dominance in key new areas of technology, including 5G telecommunications, artificial intelligence and robotics. The Trump administration wants to force a change to aggressive Chinese economic behavior and, in particular, clamp down on its cyberespionage and intellectual-property theft. In addition to the criminal charges, the United States has asked its allies to follow its lead, and start by banning China’s national champion and corporate giant from the rollout of 5G telecom networks.

Ottawa’s policy response to the Huawei crisis has forked in two directions. One is to quietly undertake an internal review of Huawei and other 5G telecommunications providers to assess security risks. The timing of the release of the review’s findings will be highly sensitive, as someone will inevitably be offended – either China or the United States.

Story continues below advertisement

The other, more high-profile response – in particular to the arrest of Ms. Meng – has been to aim for the moral high ground, proclaiming a “rule of law” approach that’s free of political interference while mobilizing an international coalition to protest China’s arbitrary detentions of Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, as well as the death sentence that a Chinese appeals court handed to Robert Schellenberg.

So far, even with the support of global allies, this campaign has won no concessions and no favours from China. After all, the “rule of law” approach trumpeted by Canada amounts to following an American legal campaign. It is important to note that our extradition laws don’t amount to adjudicating the merits of the U.S. case; the standard is much softer. Huawei faces no legal charges in Canada.

Canada has been offered a taste of what following the United States' legal and policy lead on Huawei looks like. Let’s face it: Canada’s responses to the crisis are unlikely, on their own, to offer any escape from the trap we are currently in.

The only imminent solution to the crisis lies in the success of U.S.-China trade talks now under way. And Canadians will watch, anxiously and from the sidelines, bereft of good alternative options.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies