Skip to main content

Is it wrong to ask that the creator of your crypto-currency be cryptic?

The story run by Newsweek this week that Bitcoin's founding legend does not refer to a pseudonym but one, pretty ordinary, person named Satoshi Nakamoto hit a community while they were down – down, in fact, to just over half of their $1,200-a-coin high.

Already dealing with the virtual collapse of their virtual currency, and several of their exchanges, Bitcoiners have little left to cling to but their creation myth. And Leah McGrath Goodman's story appeared to some to have robbed them of that.

Story continues below advertisement

The myth has long (well, for an Internet eon anyway – about five years) been told of an unknown person or people who individually or collectively, but most importantly to the story, mysteriously, led the development of Bitcoin.

Having a nebulous entity as a founder can really galvanize a group. He/she/they can more easily embody an entire community's ideology. But the revelation that, according to Ms. McGrath Goodman, Mr. Satoshi Nakamoto is a 64-year-old model train aficionado who at age 23 changed his name from "Satoshi Nakamoto" to "Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto" is a difficult story to romanticize.

As far as forging new identities goes, changing one's first name to "Dorian" feels a bit weak. It's certainly a far cry from a cloak of invisibility, from what we want from our heroes or messiahs. As lairs go, a suburban house in Southern California like the one Mr. Nakamoto inhabits is hardly a secure base hidden in the depths of an active volcano. He doesn't even have a fence.

There is a lot of mystique surrounding whoever, whatever ... oh let's face it, they really want it to be a shadowy anti-fiat-currency-cape-wearing cabal... is behind Bitcoin's inception. I'm sure the story presented by Newsweek was a challenging one for Bitcoin believers to accept – although I imagine no Bitcoiner would fault a man for living with his mother as, it turns out, Mr. Nakamoto does.

The reaction to Ms. Goodman's story on Reddit, a major hub of the Bitcoin community, is possibly the most Reddit sort of thing I have ever seen: conspiracy theories abound, revenge was threatened, chartered planes and safehouses were promised.

Many posters were furious that any publication would think a story revealing the identity of the father of Bitcoin, even if that identity were beyond a shadow of a doubt, was in the public interest.

A jarring sentiment to hear from deep in the heart of Wikileaks country.

After a meticulous Internet search, some Redditors quickly declared that an authentic Mr. Nakamoto, the Mr. Nakamoto, their Mr. Nakamoto, would never be so banal as to review Danish Butter Cookies on Amazon (very favourably) as Newsweek's candidate for Satoshi has done.

In fact, Mr. Nakamoto of suburban Southern California is exactly the kind of man I'd have imagined behind Bitcoin. But late Thursday, after being tracked down and chased by journalists (Newsweek ran the story with a picture of his modest house, with his car and licence plate visible in the driveway), Mr. Nakamoto himself denied having anything to do with Bitcoin.

When he told Ms. McGrath Goodman he was "no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it," as she quotes him in the most compelling evidence in her piece, he meant, he said, he was "no longer in engineering. That's it."

He claimed, to a reporter picked randomly from the many who had gathered in his front yard, that he had never heard of Bitcoin until one of his sons discussed Ms. McGrath Goodman's enquiries with him, and I find that plausible.

However, I'm also not sure how much the veracity of this story really matters to anyone except a possibly confused Mr. Nakamoto, and to Newsweek, relaunching its print edition with him as their cover .

What's more interesting was the heartfelt response from Bitcoin devotees: "Nope," posted Reddit commenter CosbyTeamTriosby on the story, "I don't know who the real Satoshi is or what he looks like, but I do know one thing for certain: Satoshi would never lie. A journalist, however, most certainly would."

Story continues below advertisement

I'm not sure who they would embrace as leader-unveiled, but, if accepted, my pitch to Newsweek that Bitcoin is the brainchild of Bruce Wayne and Tony Stark, with oversight from Ayn Rand, might mend some bridges.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter