Skip to main content

A volunteer demonstrates the driving simulator set up with a FMRI (functioning mri) at 3.0T MR at Sunnybrook Research on Nov 25 2011.

Fred Lum/Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The health accord of 2004 prompted hospitals to whittle down backlogs in five areas, including cataract surgery and diagnostic MRI scans. But these may not have been the right priorities. Greater access to primary care might have been a better choice.

Only 32 per cent of patients have 24/7 access to multidisciplinary health-care teams despite the $800-million federal Primary Health Care Transition Fund. While there are more MRI machines and many more scans are being done, wait times for these are unchanged and, in some parts of Canada, are on the rise.

The Senate subcommittee on social affairs, science and technology has reviewed the accord and tabled its report last week, which found there was success in meeting wait-times targets in four of the five areas: all except diagnostic imaging. The provinces could not all agree on how to measure it. Moreover, there is still no national pharmaceutical strategy, and the slow progress on electronic medical records is seen as a partial failure.

Story continues below advertisement

The accord saw $41.3-billion poured into health care over a decade, indexed at 6 per cent, which includes the $5.5-billion to address wait times; it was supposed to be a fix for a generation when former prime minister Paul Martin announced it.

Wait times are still being tracked from the moment a patient reaches the specialist's office – not from the first contact of care. As a result, the length of time in the queue remains a mystery.

"Overall, I don't think the Canadian people have got the best of what they need in terms of timely access to quality care," said Art Eggleton, the subcommittee's deputy chair. "So I think we still have a fair bit of work to go."

The accord was a good first step. But hospitals must face the realities of measurable goals, timetables, annual public reporting and customer service. If they do that, Canadians will truly have a system to be proud of.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter