Skip to main content

It's no surprise that president-elect Donald Trump and his transition team are dismissing a report by the Central Intelligence Agency that says Russian hackers tried to swing the election in Mr. Trump's favour. What is surprising is the way they are going about it – by mocking the past failures of the CIA and other American intelligence services.

Mr. Trump's team released a statement on Friday dismissing American intelligence agencies as "the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction." Mr. Trump himself mocked the CIA's report and the reaction to it. "Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!" the future leader of the free world tweeted on Monday.

It's ironic that Mr. Trump's team brought up the case of the WMDs that were used to justify the war in Iraq, and which turned out to be mostly non-existent.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Former Trump adviser hails 'new era' in U.S.-Russia relations at Moscow press conference

Opinion: When will Trump get out from under Putin's heel?

Read more: Russia intervened to help Trump win the White House, CIA says

It's true that, in that case, the CIA provided faulty intelligence supporting the theory that Iraq was stockpiling WMDs. But this overlooks the fact that other intelligence sources, including the Defence Intelligence Agency and a number of weapons inspectors, were arguing that there were no WMDs in Saddam Hussein's arsenal that could pose a threat.

Furthermore, it was the president and his cabinet – and not the intelligence community itself – that convinced the world that Iraq had WMDs. In doing so, the Bush White House listened to reports that supported its agenda, and ignored ones that didn't. Hundreds of thousands of people died and the Middle East was thrown into turmoil, not because some intelligence was bad, but because the White House listened selectively to what it was being told.

Mr. Trump is now doing the same thing. He doesn't want to hear that Russian operatives appear to have hacked into the e-mail servers of both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, but only released information damaging to the Democrats. There is no smoking gun, but President Barack Obama and a number of high-ranking Republican senators rightly believe the only proper next step is to fully investigate this ominous conclusion.

Intelligence is only as good as the people acting on it. Like another Republican president before him, Mr. Trump is dismissing findings that don't suit him. We all know how that can end.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies