Skip to main content

The floor of the Toronto Stock Exchange was a hive of activity today, January 27, 1953, as a record volume of 10,567,000 shares changed hands. A large proportion of the trading was done in speculative mining issues, particularly those companies with properties in the uranium area around Lake Athabaska and in the base metal areas near Bathurst, N.B. Credit: The Globe and Mail Originally published Jan. 28, 1953

The Globe and Mail

There's no reason at all to object to the decision of Greg Rickford, the Minister of Natural Resources, to allow an Australian company, Paladin Energy Ltd., to develop a uranium mine in Newfoundland and Labrador, 140 kilometres northeast of Happy Valley-Goose Bay, with Australians holding the majority of the shares.

On the contrary, the odd thing is that Paladin had to seek permission to do so, as a foreign corporation – over and above the similarly unnecessary process of the foreign investment review under the Investment Canada Act, with its mysterious "net benefit" criterion. In the rejected takeover by BHP Billiton of Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan in 2010, Ottawa even more mysteriously declared Potash to be a "strategic asset," not a term used in the ICA.

The federal government has had a "non-resident ownership policy in the uranium mining sector" since 1987. The policy allows for an exemption from the requirement of at least 51-per-cent Canadian ownership if there aren't enough Canadians who want to build the prospective uranium mine in question.

Story continues below advertisement

In March, 2011, a devastating tsunami caused the meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan and the country shut down all but two of its reactors.

And before that, in 2000, Germany began to phase out its nuclear energy program but bought nuclear-generated electricity from its next-door neighbour, France – perhaps a less nervous country.

So demand for uranium has been down for some time. Investment in Canadian uranium should be a welcome shot-in-the-arm for a depressed industry, and there's every likelihood of a rise in demand a few years hence, as uranium supplies become scarce. In particular, Saskatchewan would benefit from a revival of its uranium industry.

It's not as if Australia were Iran, a likely violator of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, in need of strenuous sanctions. Let the Aussies mine!

Editor's Note: The original newspaper version of this editorial and an earlier digital version incorrectly said  the March 2011 meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan killed almost 16,000 people. In fact, it was a devastating tsunami that killed those people and shut down two reactors at the plant.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies