Skip to main content

Editorials The divestment movement thinks oil and apartheid are the same. They aren’t

(FILES) This August 21, 2013 file photo shows an oil well near Tioga, North Dakota. AFP PHOTO / Karen BLEIER / FILESKAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images

KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images

Students who prefer to occupy the moral high ground don't have to look far for a cause to rally around. At almost every Canadian university, managers of vast pension and endowment funds direct some of their investments to oil, gas and coal companies. But what makes perfect sense to people tasked with creating revenue for retirees and educators has become anathema to students who insist universities should lead the fight against climate change rather than support polluting industries.

Activists across Canada have pressured administrators to dispose of investments in fossil-fuel companies. On Wednesday, University of Toronto president Meric Gertler rejected the chorus of calls for targeted divestment. While he accepted the need for the university to incorporate environmental, social and governance factors into its financial decision-making, he rightly called for a better way to balance the ethical and financial goals of an academic institution situated in an economy where fossil fuels are inescapable.

Students strive to be idealists and are in an enviable position to voice their hopeful ultimatums without the constraints and occasional hypocrisies of real-world responsibility – we get this, and the world should always welcome challenges to the status quo. But the current wave of demands for divestment from the fossil-fuel companies – with the associated occupation of university administration buildings, as happened at McGill this week – carry more moral fervour than this ambiguous crusade warrants.

Story continues below advertisement

Proponents of fossil-fuel divestment place it in the righteous tradition of anti-investment campaigns such as the one that targeted apartheid in South Africa. But the differences are too great for the comparison to be persuasive. Apartheid was singularly oppressive, had to be ended and could be, at a stroke. No one could reasonably talk about an acceptable amount of apartheid – it was a stark, all-or-nothing moral choice.

Fossil fuels are different. Society will need them for years to come, and there is no way for the entire planet to ditch them entirely and immediately without widespread harm. The issue is how to gradually ratchet down fossil-fuel use worldwide. The global warming problem, and the solution, are both matters of degree.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter