Skip to main content

Bernard Drainville, shown Sept. 10, 2013.

JACQUES BOISSINOT/THE CANADIAN PRESS

If the two Parti Québécois cabinet ministers who wrote a letter to The New York Times this week defending the Quebec Charter of Values had wanted to discredit themselves and their government, they could not have done a better job. Their claim that the Charter is Quebec's "Jefferson moment" is laughable and self-incriminating. The Charter is exactly the kind of state meddling in religious freedom that Thomas Jefferson sought to prevent.

Bernard Drainville, the Minister for Democratic Institutions, and Jean-François Lisée, the Minister responsible for the Montreal Region and International Affairs, were responding to a commentary piece published in the Times under the headline "Quebec's Tea Party moment." The writer of the piece argued (correctly) that the proposed Charter, which would prohibit all public employees from wearing religious symbols or dress, is an attempt by the PQ minority government to whip up anti-immigrant sentiment for political gain.

The ministers countered in their letter that the Charter is, in fact, Quebec's "Jefferson moment," because it will "enshrine into law Jefferson's 'wall of separation between church and state.' " They could not be more wrong. They don't understand – at all – what separation of church and state means. And they picked exactly the wrong historical figure to buttress their argument.

Story continues below advertisement

In 1777, Jefferson wrote the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. The third U.S. President considered it one of the three great accomplishments of his life, along with founding a university and drafting the Declaration of Independence. Consider his words: "All men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of Religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities." And: "our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions in physics or geometry." And this: "Proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence, by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages, to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right."

Jefferson's statute gave birth to the U.S. First Amendment, enacted in 1791: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Were he alive today, he would be railing against a proposal to force people to choose between working in the civil service and professing their faith. The PQ ministers' evocation of Jefferson's name shines a light not only on their poor grasp of history, but also on the twisted thinking behind the Quebec Charter of Values. As Jefferson put it in the Statute of Religious Freedom, imposing "punishments or burdens" on a free mind's religious opinions or practices tends "to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness." Exactly.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies