Skip to main content

Margaret Wente

Curtis Lantinga

It won't have escaped you that Sunday was the 20th anniversary of the Montreal massacre - that horrific day when a man walked into the city's l'École Polytechnique, separated out the female students, screamed "You are all a bunch of feminists!" and shot them with a semi-automatic rifle, leaving 14 dead. As always, the day was marked by memorials and candlelight vigils across the country, affecting interviews with families and survivors - and a large helping of overheated nonsense.

"Twenty years on, little has changed," opined the Toronto Star, which cited the fact that women continue to be killed "in their homes, on the streets, on university campuses and on lonely stretches of highway." It blamed the government, for cutting aid to violence-fighting groups and for voting to scrap the long-gun registry. "But the government is not solely to blame," it said. So who else is? "We all are." Why? Because we tolerate a viciously misogynist society.

How much sophistry can you stuff in one small space? The truth is that women in Canada have never been safer than they are today. Violent crime is trending down, and the vast majority of its victims are men. The gun registry has been written off as useless - by the Liberals. Women still suffer far too often from spousal abuse. But social tolerance of it has all but disappeared, and the laws are tough.

Story continues below advertisement

In the narrative of the Montreal massacre, the students were killed for being feminists - for daring to pursue their dream. That's true, so far as it goes. But this narrative also implies that the rage of Marc Lépine reflected the rage of ordinary men embittered by seeing women get ahead. That's a misandrist slur. And Mr. Lépine's deeply troubled background is usually ignored. The son of an Algerian-born businessman, he was born Gamil Rodrigue Liass Gharbi. His father had a deep contempt for women, and severely abused both the boy and his mother before abandoning them. Mr. Lépine obviously contracted his father's rage. But he no more resembled ordinary men than Robert Pickton does.

It's natural to try to make meaning out of ghastly events. Yet, sick and twisted people sometimes do sick and twisted things, and such crimes are largely random. The Montreal massacre is said to be different from other mass murders because a specific group (women) were the targets. But the Fort Hood killer singled out a specific group, too.

For two decades, Dec. 6 has been an annual excuse for fevered breast-beating over the moral failings of society and the persistent inequality of women - as if the glass ceiling or the lack of universal daycare existed on the same moral continuum as homicidal misogyny. "I'm not very optimistic," warned Nayyar Javed, who spoke at a vigil in Saskatchewan. "Women in Canada in all sectors are not equal to men." Monique Frize, an engineer at Carleton University, allowed that there's been "progress and regress" in women's rights, and suggested that young women are reluctant to call themselves feminists because they're being "gagged."

Yet, according to yesterday's Globe and Mail, women now make up three-fifths of all university students and most of the PhD candidates. University of Alberta president Indira Samarasekera - a woman and an engineer - warns that society can no longer ignore the problem of what's happening to men. It's true that hundreds of aboriginal women have gone missing or been murdered in recent years. But so have an even greater number of aboriginal men.

By all means, let's mourn the exceptional young women whose lives were cut short one awful day in 1989. But let's stop insisting they were victims of deep-rooted cultural misogyny. There's plenty of that in the world already. In Afghanistan, women are routinely killed for defying men. In South Asia, vast numbers of female fetuses are aborted, and girls are routinely neglected in favour of their brothers. In Canada, it's time to get a grip and move on.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.