Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Brenda Cossman is a professor of law and the director of the Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies at the University of Toronto

It's a problem hiding in plain sight. The Globe and Mail's Unfounded series documents what sexual assault survivors and their allies have long known: the criminal justice system fails them.

While these failures are many, this series documents the significant number of complaints that police decide classify as unfounded. Baseless. No crime happened. The data is the most comprehensive review of sexual assault unfounded rates ever conducted in Canada. The rates are staggering.

Story continues below advertisement

Unfounded: Police dismiss 1 in 5 sexual assault claims as baseless, Globe investigation reveals

Interactive: Will the police believe you? Compare unfounded sex assault rates across Canada

Read more: How sexual assault survivors look beyond police, courts for justice

And before anyone jumps to the conclusion that this somehow confirms the prevalence of false complaints, the Globe series exposes the many problematic reasons that cases are classified as unfounded. The cases show the disturbing extent to which the rape myths, outdated stereotypes, and obsolete understandings of trauma and memory inform these unfounded conclusions.

The report provides the kind of hard hitting empirical evidence needed to convince policy makers and police leadership that there is a problem that needs to be tackled. Survivors of sexual assault and sexual violence experts could have told us this all along, but now the data is there for all to see.

It is a problem whose solution is also hiding in plain sight. Sexual assault experts know what is needed and it's not rocket science: Training police officers. Extensive training of police officers, particularly on trauma informed approaches to investigating sexual assault. As the Unfounded series points out, these trainings, when made available, can be highly effective in transforming officers understanding of how they handle sexual assault complaints, and can reduce the number of unfounded complaints.

Civilian oversight can also reduce the number of unfounded complaints in sexual assault. The so-called 'Philadelphia model,' followed by a number of other police forces, created a system of external review of unfounded sexual assault cases. The Women's Law Project, along with other sexual violence experts, conduct an annual review of unfounded sexual assault cases, along with a random sampling of open cases, and raise concerns about any cases that may have been handled inadequately. It has proven to be effective in reducing unfounded complaints.

Story continues below advertisement

These two solutions could go a long way to reducing the number of unfounded complaints. Why aren't we already doing it? Political will. Training is expensive, and extensive training is more expensive. While police forces across the country struggle with escalating costs and cutbacks to their budgets, it is a matter of prioritizing sexual violence training, and ensuring that there is money to fund it. And civilian oversight? Well, it's fair to say that not all police forces jump up and down with delight at the idea of more oversight. Privacy concerns are cited, but privacy concerns can be worked around. Partnerships can be built. It comes down to political will. Not rocket science.

We have the data and we have the tools to reduce the number of unfounded cases. But, it is reasonable to ask, then what? Because as survivors of sexual violence and their advocates know, unfounded complaints are only the first in a series of obstacles in the criminal justice system. We could imagine a scenario in which the number of unfounded complaints is significantly reduced but the number of prosecutions and convictions do not actually increase. Decreasing the number of unfounded complaints may simply cast more light on the next set of problems. That is not a bad thing in its own right. But, it's important to keep in mind that it will not solve the multiple failures of the criminal justice system.

Sexual violence advocates have for years turned to the criminal justice system. They have valiantly struggled for and achieved important law reform, from exposing the way that rape myths have pervaded sexual assault trials to establishing new legal standards of affirmative consent. Yet, sexual violence remains prevalent as ever.

To really address the pervasiveness of sexual violence, we need to look harder at the problem, and the role of the criminal justice system in redressing it. By the time a sexual assault has occurred, we have already failed. Really addressing sexual violence means prevention. Really addressing sexual violence means education on the meaning of consent. And that's where it starts to become complicated: Sure it's serious training for all the actors in the criminal justice system: police officers, prosecutors, and judges. But it also means transformational sex education. It means changing society's understanding of the meaning of consent, sex and sexuality.

Unfounded complaints may just be the tip of the iceberg. But, thanks to the remarkable journalism of The Globe, there is nowhere for that tip to hide. Unfounded complaints are now in plain sight. So are the ways to tackle them.

The findings of a 20-month long investigation expose deep flaws in the way Canadian police forces handle sexual assault allegations. The Globe's Robyn Doolittle explains.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies