Skip to main content

As the Trump administration prepares to send a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and Mexico to Congress, Canada finds itself in a state of limbo.

This country absolutely must have a trade agreement with the United States, even if it means making substantial concessions. Those who say Canadians should tighten their belts and seek trade opportunities elsewhere aren’t wearing those belts. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are at stake. This is for real.

But it appears that the Trump administration simply doesn’t want a deal. United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is not offering an American quid in exchange for a Canadian quo. The administration is demanding nothing but concessions from Canada – on dairy, on dispute resolution, on sales taxes for duty-free goods (for crying out loud) – and is offering nothing in return, including no assurances that the Americans won’t introduce new tariffs after the agreement has been signed.

Story continues below advertisement

“It would amount to abject surrender,” says Matthew Kronby, an international trade lawyer at Borden Ladner Gervais.

“If the U.S. is essentially saying it can impose unilateral tariffs any time it wants and no one can do anything about it … how do you do a deal with the Americans under those circumstances?" he asks. The Americans are not demanding that Canada sign a bad deal. The Americans are returning to a state of nature.

Under the circumstances, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is unwilling to sign. Prime Minister Andrew Scheer wouldn’t sign either.

But make no mistake: Canada is in a bad place. Unless the two sides can strike some kind of agreement in the coming days or weeks, the fate of this country’s trading relationship with the United States will be out of the hands of this government.

We will have to hope that the current Congress, or the next one, insists that Canada be brought into the final agreement. We will have to hope that President Donald Trump doesn’t cancel the existing North American free-trade agreement, impose new tariffs on automobiles and throw up some fresh, as-yet-unimagined obstacle, just to show who’s boss.

It is never a good day when your fate is up to others. It is never a good day when you must appeal to the better angels of the American nature.

In the short term, at least, the Liberals will profit from the situation. A resolute Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister refuse to be cowed by this bully of a president, this predator, this Mussolini wannabe.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadians of every political stripe will stand in solidarity with the government on this day.

But there are almost 400 days to come until the next federal election. Will the Canadians and Americans find a way to reach an agreement next year if not this year, vindicating Canadian perseverance? Will Mr. Trump lay off auto tariffs, convinced by the industry executives that those tariffs would be as hard on the U.S. economy as on the Canadian? Or will everything go south?

Eventually, the Conservatives will roll out their counternarrative. A deal was reachable on this day and on these terms, they will say, but the Trudeau team rejected it, hoping for something better. Mr. Trudeau and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland blew it. The NAFTA narrative will join with the pipeline narrative and the carbon tax narrative into a single story that will determine the fate of this government.

What will matter most is what happens going forward. Does the auto sector muddle through, growth continue and unemployment remain manageable, or does uncertainty and the threat of tariffs begin to drag the economy down?

“Uncertainty is almost as good as no deal at all for the Americans,” observes Pedro Antunes, deputy chief economist at the Conference Board of Canada. If you were going to build a new factory, why would you put it in Canada, when no one knows what tariffs may be slapped on your goods? Why not just put it in Tennessee?

Will Congress eventually rein in this President and this administration? If they don’t, and the United States abandons a rules-based trading system, what will become of us?

Story continues below advertisement

No one can answer these questions. The ones who know the most just shrug.

U.S. President Donald Trump says he rejected Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's request for a meeting during the UN General Assembly because NAFTA talks are going poorly and the United States is unhappy with Canada's negotiators. Reuters
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter