Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Conservative and Independent Senators on Tuesday tabled competing packages of amendments to the government’s much-criticized Bill C-69 that aims to overhaul Ottawa’s system for approving major resource projects.

The Conservative version would require fundamental changes sought by some provinces, and major oil and pipeline industry associations but would likely be rejected by the Liberal government.

The Independent Senate Group has put forward 80 amendments that it says would clarify the bill and answer some of the concerns of industry but would be more likely to be accepted by the Liberal government.

Story continues below advertisement

Senators began debating the amendments late Tuesday but agreed to have the committee clerk work on two packages to find common ground before they resume their efforts.

The Liberal government argues Bill C-69 would speed up the review of major resource projects, ensuring those in the public interest are approved, while providing greater protection to the environment and the rights if Indigenous people.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney told the committee last week that passage of the bill in anything resembling its current form would severely hurt the oil industry, feed western alienation and provoke a court challenge from his government.

Energy industry executives and provincial governments have slammed the bill, saying it would drive away investment and intrude on areas of provincial responsibility. Environmental groups, meanwhile, worry the fierce lobbying campaign waged over it will result in the bill being tilted to favour development.

Conservative Senator Michael MacDonald tabled 70 amendments – 192 pages – and asked the committee to support the entire package that would stress economic development, rein in the discretion of the Minister of Environment to intervene in the review process and limit public participation in hearings.

Senator MacDonald said the Liberals’ Bill C-69 is the most controversial he has dealt with in his 10 years in the Senate and is the most studied by a Senate committee, which held hearings across the country on it.

“The prevailing view of the bill is overwhelmingly negative,” he said. “We heard it from the provinces, the municipalities and national industry associations. In fact, industry has told us that their proposed amendments already represent a significant compromise on their part, in good faith, and they are not willing to further compromise on their compromise.”

Story continues below advertisement

However, Independent Senator Yuen Pau Woo criticized the Conservatives for adopting a package of amendments put forward by the industry associations representing pipeline and oil companies. “We are senators, not stenographers,” he told the committee.

The Independent amendments “touch on all the key issues that we heard expressed from industry, from environmental groups, from First Nations and others,” he said in an interview. He said the changes would also limit ministerial discretion and provide greater clarity that economic impacts must be considered along with social and environmental ones during reviews.

Alberta Independent Senator Paula Simons said there are “not a lot of radical differences” in the two packages and urged other committee members to work together to find “elegant solutions.”

Federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna told the committee last week that the government was open to some amendments. Senator Woo said the Independent leaders consulted with the government to ensure it would accept the proposed amendments so the bill can be passed before summer.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies