Skip to main content

For the second year in a row, the Speaker of the House of Commons has chastised Finance Minister Bill Morneau for stuffing measures into a bill that were never mentioned in his budget.

Speaker Geoff Regan ruled Tuesday that measures in Mr. Morneau’s 854-page budget bill – which Mr. Regan called “massive” – related to new federal labour laws were not mentioned in the 2018 budget and will therefore be voted on separately by MPs.

The government said they were mentioned in the 2017 budget.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think this is a bit of a stretch,” Mr. Regan said.

The House of Commons has given the Speaker the power to order separate votes on bills – part of a Liberal Party campaign pledge to stop the misuse of omnibus bills.

However, since taking office, the Liberals have repeatedly been accused of using large omnibus bills to avoid scrutiny.

The Speaker ruled last fall that measures contained in a 2017 budget bill were not related to the budget, despite Mr. Morneau’s repeated claims that everything in the legislation was connected to the budget.

The Speaker thanked NDP finance critic Peter Julian Tuesday for raising his concern that a bill of such size limits the ability of MPs to review its contents.

“This is a massive bill, the largest budget implementation bill to date,” Mr. Regan said. “That said, the rules and practices have yet to address the issue of limits on length of legislation.”

Essentially, Mr. Regan said Parliament has not given him the authority to rule on whether a budget bill is too big.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Julian raised the Speaker’s ruling directly with Mr. Morneau on Tuesday afternoon during a meeting of the House of Commons finance committee. He said the ruling shows there is “far too much dumped in this one piece of legislation for proper scrutiny,” adding that the Speaker’s finding “flies in the face” of the Liberal Party’s commitment to end the use of undemocratic omnibus bills.

Mr. Morneau said he respects the Speaker’s decision but defended his bill.

“We did make a commitment that we would put forth budget implementation acts that only contained measures that were in our budget or in budgets,” he said. “That approach, which we committed to taking, has been followed.”

In fact, the Liberal pledge made no reference to budget bills; it contained the broad promise “We will not resort to legislative tricks to avoid scrutiny.”

It went on to say: “[Former Conservative Prime Minister] Stephen Harper has also used omnibus bills to prevent Parliament from properly reviewing and debating his proposals. We will change the House of Commons Standing Orders to bring an end to this undemocratic practice.”

In a recent letter to The Globe and Mail, Mr. Morneau rejected criticism of his latest budget bill, C-86.

Story continues below advertisement

“At 854 pages, it is indeed long – but to suggest it is overly so is absurd,” he wrote.

By way of comparison, the government released Bill C-87, the Poverty Reduction Act, on Tuesday with significant fanfare. The legislation sets an official poverty line, establishes targets for reducing poverty and creates a national advisory council on the issue. It is six pages long.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter