Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Getty Images/iStockphoto

Canadians get an updated picture of the country's resource economy in two key budgets this week, and it's certain to be bleak given the damage from the oil slump.

Both Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador release their budgets Thursday. Both will underscore the hit from the collapse in crude prices and, as BMO Nesbitt Burns put it, "they're not going to be pretty."

In October, noted BMO senior economist Robert Kavcic, Alberta had assumed a $5.4-billion deficit for fiscal 2016-17, but that came with an expected West Texas intermediate oil price of $61 (U.S.) a barrel. Oil price assumptions will now have to be lower, he added, which means a hit to revenues, as well.

Story continues below advertisement

"While the weaker Canadian dollar will cushion the hit somewhat, published budget senstivities suggest that combination could still lead to a revenue shortfall of around $3-billion, all else equal, and the Finance Minister has indeed hinted at a deficit of roughly $10-billion (close to 3 per cent of GDP)," Mr. Kavcic said, adding that the government is certain to opt for stimulus over austerity.

Then there's Newfoundland and Labrador, whose fiscal standing is "the most critical in Canada," Mr. Kavcic added. The province's deficit had been on track to swell to $2.4-billion in fiscal 2016-17, and near $2-billion a year later. But again, those numbers were based on higher oil price assumptions.

"Suffice it to say that some tough decisions will have to be in this budget, the first under the newly elected government, in order to right the fiscal ship," Mr. Kavcic said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies