Skip to main content

Essar Algoma management and advisers concluded that Essar group “lacked the financial ability” to buy the steelmaker, Judge Newbould said in his ruling.

Kenneth Armstrong/The Globe and Mail

The era of Essar Steel Algoma Inc. as a part of the business empire controlled by the Ruia brothers of India appears to have come to an end.

Essar Group, which paid $1.85-billion to buy Algoma Steel Inc. in 2007, has been ruled out as a potential buyer of the company it put into creditor protection last November, sources familiar with the steel company's restructuring said.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Frank Newbould issued a judgment earlier this week that in effect disqualified an unidentified bidder from participating in the sales process set up by Essar Algoma as part of the restructuring.

Story continues below advertisement

That bidder is Essar Group, the sources said.

Management of Essar Algoma, along with the steel maker's restructuring and financial advisers and the court-appointed monitor, concluded that "the subject bidder lacked the financial ability to consummate the proposed transaction," Justice Newbould said in his ruling.

Sources said Essar Group has also made a bid to purchase U.S. Steel Canada Inc., which, like Essar Algoma, is operating under the protection of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act amid a steel industry downturn that will change the ownership of two of Canada's three largest integrated steel makers.

U.S. Steel Canada will operate under new ownership once it emerges from CCAA protection because its former parent, United States Steel Corp., has not submitted a bid to buy back its Canadian assets and cut the Canadian unit loose from further financial support last year.

The Essar Algoma trip through creditor protection is the third court-supervised restructuring for the steel maker, which is located in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.

Justice Newbould rejected a bid by the United Steelworkers union (USW) to force the entities controlling Essar Algoma's restructuring to include Essar Group in the second phase of the sales process, from which a winning bidder is expected to be chosen.

The union argued that it was not consulted in the decision to exclude Essar Group, but that it should have been under the terms of the sales process, which said stakeholders were to be consulted.

Story continues below advertisement

"Technically, the USW might be right, but as a practical matter, it made no difference," Justice Newbould wrote. "The decision as to whether the subject bidder provided sufficient evidence of its financial ability to close the contemplated transaction was one for Essar Algoma to make," along with its advisers and the monitor.

Essar Algoma said in response to the union's move that USW local 2251 in Sault Ste. Marie was seeking "to obtain total control over the conduct and the outcome of the [sales process] for the sole benefit of its members."

Mike Da Prat, president of local 2251, said the confidentiality agreements forbid him from revealing the name of the bidder. He said the union is unlikely to appeal the decision, saying the court system does not favour unions.

Essar Group has about $15-billion (U.S.) in debt and is seeking to liquidate some assets, reports out of India say. Essar Steel Minnesota, a planned iron ore mine and processing plant in Minnesota, is also in financial trouble.

Essar Algoma listed long-term debt of $1.34-billion (Canadian) when it filed for CCAA protection in November.

When Algoma became the object of a bidding war during the steel industry consolidation that swept aside what was then a Canadian-owned industry in the 2000s, the company listed cash of $152.4-million on its balance sheet in the financial report it filed before being taken over.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.