Skip to main content

Kathy Bush is chair of the National Policy Committee, Association of Canadian Pension Management (ACPM).

You have been and may still be a contributor to a defined-contribution plan or group RRSP. Your savings have grown as your employer, through an external expert, has managed your investment portfolio. Your retirement savings will be used for retirement spending. What could possibly go wrong?

The answer, unfortunately, is too much.

Story continues below advertisement

Upon your retirement, you will have to convert your accumulated savings into retirement income and the management of those savings will shift from your employer to yourself. You will have the responsibilities of investment options and returns, the estimation of their own longevity and, most importantly, ensuring that you will have enough retirement money.

Read more: How to pay yourself in retirement: It's a science

The complexity of managing retirement investments is something that many retirees cannot handle. According to a U.S. study, titled The Effects of Conflicted Investment Advice on Retirement Savings, it has been suggested that high costs, poor decisions and conflicted advice can produce retirement incomes significantly less than if institutional fees, smart defaults and fiduciary oversight were applied.

This is a problem for retirees, but also for the economy and society at large. Within the next decade, nearly one person in four in the labour force could be 55 years of age or older, and a significant portion of the population will be transitioning to retirement. Looking at defined-contribution plans only, there are more than one million plan members holding an estimated $67-billion in assets. Pension record keepers estimate that 80 per cent to 90 per cent of Canadian retirement savings, outside of defined-benefit pension plans, will be converted to retirement income through individual plans.

How can you reduce your risk? There are individual decumulation options such as annuities, but retirees may find them inflexible, expensive and subject to the fluctuation of interest rates and inflation. Alternately, there are individual life income funds (LIFs) and registered retirement income funds (RRIFs) that act like CAP (capital accumulation plan) arrangements in reverse and provide payments to a retiree over time, but they can carry risk related to longevity and investment return assumptions. But another solution may be around the corner.

The Association of Canadian Pension Management (ACPM) believes that CAP sponsors and regulators, service providers and governments need to work together on another solution. There are options and processes in Australia, Britain and the United States that address some of these issues that leave our current options incomplete.

As a start, we need to offer retirement-plan designs that provide for managed withdrawals, longevity protection, access to lump sums, inflation protection and default options. They should also include some of the features that help retirees make investment decisions in their savings phase such as limited choice, low-cost, suitable defaults, auto-features and clear communications. These designs should guide, not mandate, retiree decisions. Group options designed with these options would produce better outcomes.

Story continues below advertisement

While current retirement-income options through advisers provide individual services, freedom and flexibility, they can be expensive. In addition, most employers are reluctant to offer default decumulation options or retiree assistance without liability protection. Improving the disclosure of costs and offering employers some liability protection would provide retirees with better choices and improve outcomes.

Group plans would permit retirees to access familiar funds and tools, pool retirement risks and capture the economies of scale. But they must also be designed and supported by a regulatory framework that recognizes: 1) retirees often have other assets beyond government and employer-sponsored retirement savings such as houses, inheritances and personal savings and 2) that longevity protection is also required.

Our government and financial-services industry have done a tremendous job expanding the use and success of retirement-savings plans. Where we must improve, however, is in the decumulation of those savings. Now is the time for joint action before a small problem becomes a much bigger problem over the next decade.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.