Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Gerald McGoey, former CEO of Look Communications.

KEVIN VAN PAASSEN/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Amid a climate of continuing concern over executive pay, boards of directors looking to hand themselves big bonus packages or stock options will think twice after a recent ruling from the Ontario Court of Appeal, corporate governance experts say.

The ruling involves a company called Unique Broadband Systems Inc. (UBS), which went into bankruptcy protection in July, 2011, and owned a controlling interest in an upstart cable and Internet company called Look Communications Inc.

A court fight erupted after shareholders objected to a move by directors of both companies to authorize about $20-million in payments to themselves and some consultants. The payments came after Look sold its wireless spectrum to a partnership of Bell and Rogers in 2009 for $80-million.

Story continues below advertisement

In the July 10 decision, the Court of Appeal ruled that Gerald McGoey, who served as both a director and chief executive officer of both UBS and Look, was not entitled to millions in bonuses and a "golden parachute" in severance pay because he had breached his fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of UBS.

According to the appeal judgment, Mr. McGoey and the UBS board's compensation committee, which had no independent members, met and voted to give themselves larger bonuses after the spectrum sale, despite what was deemed a disappointing price. The decision was made without any comparisons to what other directors had been paid in similar situations, the ruling said.

While legal experts say the ruling in the case does not create any new law, it is one of only a handful of Court of Appeal decisions on these issues and it clarifies the duties of directors faced with decisions involving their own pay.

Those most concerned with the decision's implications will be directors involved in what law professor Richard Leblanc calls "grey" boards with less rigorous corporate governance.

"This I think will move the bar," said Prof. Leblanc, who teaches at Osgoode Hall law school in Toronto and advises corporate boards. "... The 'grey' directors will worry."

He said the decision reinforces the need for corporate boards to appoint independent directors to compensation committees to decide on pay, as well as hire compensation experts to produce reports showing what other comparable directors make, in order to ensure decisions are beyond reproach.

Carol Hansell, a Toronto lawyer who specializes in corporate governance, highlighted the appeal decision's striking down of an earlier ruling that said Mr. McGoey was entitled to at least his severance pay, despite his breach, because his contract entitled him to it.

Story continues below advertisement

She said directors and executives often try to line contracts with safeguards like this, but this decision highlights that such efforts are doomed to fail: "You can't contract out of your fiduciary duty ... It's helpful to have that showcased by the Court of Appeal."

Clifford Cole of Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, lead lawyer for UBS in the case, said the ruling shows that boards cannot always shelter behind the so-called "business judgment rule" that sees courts give deference to business decisions.

"This decision, both at the trial level and at the Court of Appeal level, is a true victory for stakeholders, for shareholders," Mr. Cole said. "It sets clear parameters on what [boards] can do and how they can do it, and what they need to have to justify what they've done."

Toronto lawyer Joe Groia, who acts for Mr. McGoey, said he did not think the decision would have any effect on corporate governance, as it does not create any new duties or tests for directors.

He said the fight at the heart of the dispute is actually due in court next year, in a parallel case that pits Look Communications Inc. against Mr. McGoey and other former directors. He said the recent appeal decision would have "very little impact" on that trial.

"Mr. McGoey is obviously disappointed," Mr. Groia said. "He still believes that based on what he was told and the advice he got at the time, he thought he was acting appropriately. The court has said he was not, and he respects that statement."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies