Skip to main content

Report On Business Women, minorities making gains on Canadian corporate boards: report

iStockphoto/iStockphoto

The proportion of women on Canadian corporate boards took its largest leap ever in 2015 to almost 20 per cent, but Canada continues to slide behind globally as other major countries move even more quickly to embrace diversity.

A new report from the Canadian Board Diversity Council shows women now comprise 19.5 per cent of directors of Canada's 500 largest companies, up from 17.1 per cent last year. The 2.4-percentage-point increase is the largest annual growth rate for gender diversity, exceeding the 1.5-percentage-point gain between 2013 and 2014, CBDC data show.

The study also showed a large increase in the number of visible minorities on boards, climbing to 7.3 per cent of directors from just 2 per cent last year.

Story continues below advertisement

Despite the improvements, CBDC founder Pamela Jeffery said the pace of change in gender diversity feels "glacial" compared with some other major countries.

Canada ranked 15th among major industrialized countries for women on boards in 2014, a decline from sixth place in 2009 and ninth place in 2011, Ms. Jeffery said.

The U.S. ranked ninth and Britain was in fourth place.

Britain has no all-male boards on the FTSE 100 index and just 15 all-male boards on the FTSE 250 index, while Canada has 109 all-male boards among the FP500, Ms. Jeffery said.

The trends suggest other countries are ahead in recognizing that companies with greater diversity perform better financially, she said.

"We're not keeping up with our trading partners, whose companies have recognized they can deliver superior financial performance," Ms. Jeffery said.

Ms. Jeffrey said Britain has seen particularly rapid improvement because it introduced new regulations in 2012 requiring companies to report on their approach to gender diversity, similar to new rules that took effect in Canada this year. But she says Britain's rules have "more teeth" and Canada should toughen its standards.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian publicly listed companies are simply required to disclose whether they have a written diversity policy for boards and senior management. Canadian companies are not required to have a written policy and can instead explain why they have opted not to comply with the recommendation, while British companies are required to have a policy.

Ms. Jeffrey said the distinction is critical, because written policies by definition include plans for action that lead to improvement.

"A policy has specific outcomes. In any business when you're putting in policies, you're trying to achieve an objective," she said.

The CBDC also surveyed corporate directors about diversity and their boards' actions on the issue. Ms. Jeffrey said 49 per cent of directors report that their boards have a diversity policy, yet an Ontario Securities Commission review of diversity disclosure statements found that just 14 per cent of companies reported having written diversity policies this year, a gap she found perplexing.

Ms. Jeffrey said it is possible some directors believe their boards have policies, but they are only informal and there is nothing written down.

"That's not a policy – that's hope," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

The CBDC survey also found that 82 per cent of directors believe their boards are diverse, even though statistics show low proportions of women, visible minorities and aboriginals on boards.

Ms. Jeffrey said it is encouraging to see more visible minority directors on boards this year, but said she wants to see whether the trend continues next year. The data come from a survey of 382 corporate directors, with 28 people or 7 per cent reporting they self-identify as visible minorities.

She said many companies that adopted diversity policies in the past two years have included other forms of diversity beyond gender, such as race and ethnicity, which could be encouraging boards to search for other diverse candidates to fill new positions.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter