Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

ESPN analyst Dan Shulman awaits the start of the Maryland and Indiana NCAA college basketball game in College Park, Md., on Jan. 10, 2017.

GAIL BURTON/The Associated Press

When Sportsnet announced it would do away with a standalone radio broadcast of Toronto Blue Jays games this season and replace it with a simulcast called by Dan Shulman and Buck Martinez for both radio and television, fans cried foul. Though the network explained the move was made because of protocols related to COVID-19, no other Major League Baseball team will be simulcasting its games.

The Globe and Mail spoke to a number of prominent broadcasters, writers and super fans about the loss of a dedicated radio play-by-play broadcast, a Canadian spring and summer tradition built on the legacy of airwave heroes Jerry Howarth, Tom Cheek and others.

Veteran television and radio broadcaster Bob McCown, who served as the public-address announcer for Blue Jays games at Exhibition Stadium during the franchise’s inaugural season

Story continues below advertisement

I don’t think people will notice a perceptible difference as long as Dan Shulman is allowed to, essentially, do a radio broadcast on television. That can be done. A television broadcast on the radio, however, doesn’t work. So now you get into the television producer’s mentality versus the radio producer’s mentality.

It’s little things like commercial breaks and promos. If you have a radio crew, they’re able to promote things that are coming up on the radio. Just as Dan Shulman and Buck Martinez would promote things coming up on Sportsnet. Are they going to do radio network promos on television? I doubt it.

I lived through the relationship between radio and television for a long time, on Prime Time Sports. It’s not a friendly relationship. It is confrontational. That’s where you create a potential situation that could be problematic. And I’m not even sure the suits who made this decision realize it.

Geddy Lee, Rush singer-bassist and Blue Jays season-ticket holder

Some of my most memorable baseball memories were not from sitting in the stands or watching the game on the tube, but listening to the radio. Driving home from the cottage, I heard Dave Stieb’s heartbreaking first one-hitter.

There are nuances and descriptors that radio broadcasters share with their audiences that are simply not the same as a cabal of TV announcers, no matter how good they are. It’s a time-honoured craft that requires a special ability to bring to life what we at home simply cannot see. This is a bad and regrettable decision.

Comedian Ron James, whose Live From My Living Room: Spring Loaded streams on March 21

Story continues below advertisement

I’m not sure simulcasts are the end of the world. Perhaps people are overreacting. But we’re losing something we value, and it’s already possible we’re not going to see any baseball in person in Toronto this season. In the United States, you can get a vaccination at a Wendy’s drive-thru. Here in Canada, we’re still waiting for the cotton swabs to show up from Mauritania.

Stacey May Fowles, novelist and author of Baseball Life Advice

There’s a certain obvious nostalgia, romance and style of storytelling to the experience of the traditional radio broadcast. During a time when we are all groping for the comfort of the familiar, for connection, that feels exceedingly valuable.

Baseball demands a lot of time from fans, and that distinctive background hum feels so important in terms of accessing the game. Even though Jays baseball on the radio is not actually disappearing, it does feel like it’s about to be fundamentally changed – that it could easily become an afterthought. Even if you’re optimistic, it’s hard to deny that the loss of any beloved media stings right now, because it’s part of a much bigger picture of things – of experiences, and places, and voices – that we have lost.

Mark Hebscher, host of the podcast Hebsy on Sports

I’m worried that Dan Shulman is being stretched to a point where it‘s unfair to a broadcaster of his stature. To put the idea in his head that he has to be speaking differently – to present the game differently – is a big ask of Dan.

Story continues below advertisement

Maybe if they tell Dan and Buck Martinez to pretend it’s a radio broadcast, that might serve everybody. But I don’t think so. I think you have to have a dedicated radio broadcast. That said, if anybody can pull it off, it’s Dan and Buck. They’ve been together a long time. The chemistry is there.

Steve Patterson, host of CBC Radio’s The Debaters

It’s a different skill, calling a game on radio, as opposed to calling it on television. Radio is the theatre of the mind. I’ve learned about this on The Debaters. Baseball on the radio takes me back to my childhood. I could have passed Tom Cheek on the streets as a kid and not known it was him. If someone had told me who he was, I probably would have lost my mind, because I listened to him more than I would listen to some members of my own family.

Bernie Finkelstein, founder of True North Records and season-ticket holder from Day 1

I think Dan Shulman might well be the best baseball broadcaster in any medium that we’ve had in Toronto. And I think Dan and Buck Martinez will be able to handle the simulcast. That said, I’m totally against not having a standalone radio broadcast. It’s too bad that Sportsnet won’t be out there trying to find another radio team like Tom Cheek and Jerry Howarth.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies