Skip to main content

Donald Fehr, Executive Director of the NHLPA pauses as he speaks to journalists following collective bargaining talks in Toronto on Wednesday, August 15, 2012.

Chris Young/THE CANADIAN PRESS

One day after hearing NHL commissioner Gary Bettman say a "wide gap" remained in collective bargaining negotiations, players were still upset the owners quickly dismissed their initial proposal this week.

"The industry's grown a billion dollars since (the lockout) and basically they just want more money," Chris Campoli, a member of the NHLPA's negotiating committee, said Thursday.

"I thought in our proposal we made a step and considerable concessions to them," he added. "Frankly, it was a little disappointing to see the response yesterday and the view they have on it."

Story continues below advertisement

Campoli was one of three NHL players who took part in Thursday's sub-committee meetings, which covered secondary issues not related to the economic ones that have divided the sides.

An unrestricted free agent who spent last season in Montreal, Campoli has emerged as one of the strongest voices among the players. The veteran defenceman has attended six bargaining sessions this summer and was hopeful that Tuesday's NHLPA proposal might kickstart negotiations.

The players offered to keep a hard salary cap and put a drag on their salaries in exchange for an expanded revenue-sharing system — but Bettman and the owners weren't in favour of it.

Campoli said he thought it was a much more reasonable offer than the one put forward by the NHL last month, which called for a 24 per cent reduction in salaries and included new contract restrictions.

"I just think they took such an aggressive stance with their first proposal," said Campoli. "We could have taken an aggressive stance the other way and we didn't. You know, we want to fix the systematic issues they have with the way things are run and I think we're being more than fair."

The CBA topic was also raised in Philadelphia, where forward Wayne Simmonds signed a six-year contract extension worth slightly less than $24 million. He's anxious to see the situation get resolved.

"This is my first time going through this and I'm really not too familiar with the process," said Simmonds. "But from all the players' accounts, we want to play. We're ready to start."

Story continues below advertisement

It's unclear when they'll get the chance.

With a Sept. 15 deadline looming for a lockout and the sides still far apart, the league appears to be headed for its second work stoppage in as many negotiations.

"It would be incredible how much it would hurt," said Campoli. "We don't want that as players and I think our proposal shows that. We want to get something done, we're working towards it.

"The fact that we continually have to talk about this speaks to the issues we really have and the system we're in and it's got to change."

CRUNCHING THE NUMBERS

Here's a look at how the salary cap and salary floor would be impacted by the current CBA along with proposals from the NHL and NHL Players' Association for the 2012-13 season:

Story continues below advertisement

Current system

Salary cap: $70.2-million

Salary floor: $54.2-million

NHL's proposal

Salary cap: $50.8-million

Salary floor: $38.8-million

Story continues below advertisement

NHLPA's proposal (Assuming a fixed $16-million gap is kept in place)

Salary cap: $69-million

Salary floor: $53-million

(All currency U.S.)

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies