Skip to main content

Canadian players celebrate after winning the semi final match of the Women's Rugby World Cup 2014 between France and Canada, at the Jean Bouin stadium, in Paris, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2014.

Remy de la Mauviniere/The Associated Press

Canada, runner-up at the Women's Rugby World Cup this summer, is one of seven teams granted automatic qualification for the 2017 tournament.

World Rugby, formerly known as the International Rugby Board, says the top seven teams from the 2014 competition – champion England, Canada, France, Ireland, New Zealand, the United States and Australia – are confirmed for the 2017 tournament.

The remaining five teams will be determined through qualification to include:

Story continues below advertisement

  • The two best-ranked Six Nations women’s teams (outside of those teams already qualified) from the combined results of the 2015 and 2016 Women’s Six Nations tournaments.
  • The winner of a home-and-away playoff match between the lowest-ranked side in the Women’s Six Nations (combined 2015 and 2016 results and outside of the teams already qualified) and the Rugby Europe women’s champion.
  • The two best-ranked teams from a final qualifying tournament featuring South Africa, one team from Oceania and two teams from Asia.

A decision on tournament host will be made in May, 2015.

The Women's World Cup, which was won by England by a 21-9 score over Canada in Paris in August, will move to 2017 "to maximize synergy with the Olympic and Rugby World Cup Sevens cycles," according to World Rugby. The event will return to a four-year cycle after 2017.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter