Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Arsenal's Mesut Ozil, right, and Ainsley Maitland-Niles warm up before a match at Emirates Stadium in London on Dec. 15, 2019.

JOHN SIBLEY/Reuters

Stores in China said on Monday they were still selling Arsenal kit even after Mesut Oezil’s Uyghur comments, in a sign the soccer club may not be as heavily punished commercially as the National Basketball Association was over a pro-Hong Kong tweet.

A chat room on Oezil on online forum Baidu Tieba was shut on Monday, and the state-backed Global Times tabloid said that Oezil’s online fan club had been “suspended” without providing further details. Some Chinese sellers on Alibaba’s Taobao e-commerce platform said they had stopped selling his shirts.

But even as the fallout from his comments blasting China’s policy toward its Muslim Uyghur minority continued – drawing criticism from China’s Foreign Ministry, state media and some fans – merchandise from the London club was still on sale.

Story continues below advertisement

State broadcaster CCTV on Sunday had removed Arsenal’s Premier League game against Manchester City from its broadcast schedule. Chinese video-streaming website PPTV did the same.

Arsenal was quick to distance itself from their midfielder’s comments, posting a statement on China’s Twitter-like Weibo platform saying it was his personal opinion.

But they prompted speculation the club would face a fate similar to the NBA, which says it has incurred substantial financial losses in China after a Houston Rockets official tweeted his support for the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests.

After the tweet by the Rockets’ general manager, Chinese broadcasters stopped showing NBA games, while corporate partners in the country scrapped or suspended relations with the league. Houston Rockets sneakers and other merchandise were also pulled from several Nike stores.

But checks by Reuters at stores selling merchandise by Arsenal’s official kit supplier Adidas AG in Beijing and Shanghai showed products related to the Premier League team were still on sale on Monday.

“We didn’t receive any message that Arsenal’s co-branded products should be removed from the shelves. These co-branded products were a collaboration with the whole Arsenal team, not with the player Oezil,” said a staff member at one of Adidas’ Shanghai stores who would only give his name as Ben.

Adidas did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Story continues below advertisement

Arsenal-branded merchandise was also still on sale on major Chinese e-commerce platforms Alibaba and JD.com on Monday. These platforms took Houston Rockets merchandise off their sales platforms in October after the comments.

‘FAKE NEWS’

While some young Chinese, such as student Xiong Zexin, 23, said: "It is always like this. They must pay a price for this,” much of the furor has centred on Oezil, not the club.

“If you don’t understand this matter then there’s no need for you to make comments about politics. You’re not a politician,” student Li Yandong, 29, said.

At least five sellers on Alibaba’s domestically focused e-commerce platform Taobao said that they were no longer selling jerseys emblazoned with Oezil’s name and his number, 10, due to the incident.

The United Nations and human-rights groups estimate that between one million and two million people, mostly ethnic Uyghur Muslims, have been detained in harsh conditions in Xinjiang as part of what Beijing calls an anti-terrorism campaign. China has repeatedly denied any mistreatment of Uyghurs.

Oezil, a Turkish Muslim, called Uyghurs “warriors who resist persecution” and criticized both China’s crackdown and the silence of Muslims in response.

Story continues below advertisement

China’s Foreign Ministry said on Monday that Oezil had been “completely deceived by fake news and false statements” and said he was welcome to visit Xinjiang.

“We also welcome Mr. Ozil to come to Xinjiang if he has the chance, to take a walk and look around, as long as he has a conscience, is able to distinguish right from wrong and uphold the principles of objectivity and fairness, he will see a different Xinjiang,” its statement said.

An executive at another Chinese broadcaster, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the situation, said CCTV and PPTV’s reactions were to be expected given the precedence set by the NBA, but said the timing and fact that Arsenal was British, and not American, could give it some leeway.

“The Arsenal incident is quite different from the NBA incident, because that happened just after [China’s] National Day, when patriotic feelings were high,” he said.

Still the Global Times, which is vocal in its criticism of companies whose behaviour displeases Beijing, warned that Arsenal could still face further blowback. The newspaper’s position does not necessarily reflect Chinese government policy.

“The episode has destroyed Oezil’s image and Arsenal and the Premier League may have to pay the price,” the Global Times said on its official Twitter account.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies