Chilean leaders on Monday began trying to chart a fresh course toward updating the country’s dictatorship-era constitution after voters overwhelmingly rejected a progressive proposal that many felt went too far.
The heavy loss was a blow to youthful President Gabriel Boric, who met with congressional leaders Monday to begin hammering out a way to create another proposal or modify the current constitution.
Although rejection had been expected in Sunday’s plebiscite, the almost 24-point margin was a shocking repudiation of a document that was three years in the making and had been promoted as a democratic effort to replace the constitution imposed by General Augusto Pinochet 41 years ago.
The constitution, written by a convention split equally between male and female delegates, characterized Chile as a plurinational state, would have established autonomous Indigenous territories, and prioritized the environment and gender parity.
With 99.9 per cent of the votes counted, the rejection camp led by 61.9 per cent to 38.1 per cent and turnout was heavy, with voting mandatory.
The Chilean peso strengthened and stocks in the Santiago market soared Monday after rejection of a constitution that would have increased environmental regulations on businesses.
Mr. Boric, who had lobbied hard for the new constitution, said the results made it evident the Chilean people “were not satisfied with the constitutional proposal.”
The President said there would now likely be “adjustments to our governing team” as he seeks to find a path forward.
Despite the loss, the large majority believe the current constitution needs changing; they just felt the proposed one was not a suitable replacement, analysts say.
Mr. Boric made clear the process to amend it would not end with Sunday’s vote. He said it was necessary for leaders to “work with more determination, more dialogue, more respect” to reach a new proposal “that unites us as a country.”
To that end, Mr. Boric met with the heads of both chambers of Congress Monday to start determining a path forward.
After the sit-down with Mr. Boric, Senator Alvaro Elizalde, the head of the Senate, said that he and his counterpart in the lower house, Raul Soto, will call for meetings with the country’s political parties and social movements to start a dialogue that will launch a new constitutional process.
The meetings will seek “to move forward toward a new constitution that will unite all Chileans,” Mr. Elizalde said. “We hope to move quickly in this process, listening to the different views and proposals.”
In Chile’s capital of Santiago, horns blared in celebration Sunday night as people gathered in numerous intersections to celebrate the results.
“We’re happy because, really, we all want a new constitution, but one that is done right and this one didn’t fulfill the expectations of the majority,” Lorena Cornejo, 34, said while waving a Chilean flag. “Now we have to work for a new one that unites us, this one didn’t represent us and that was clear in the vote.”
Even some who were in favour of the proposed constitution put a positive spin on the defeat.
“Although it’s true that I wanted it to be approved, this is a new opportunity to reform everything that people didn’t agree with,” Alain Olivares, 36, said. “We’re just going to have to wait longer to change the constitution.”
Carlos Salinas, a spokesman for the Citizens’ House for Rejection, said the majority of Chileans saw rejection as “a path of hope.”
Despite polls that foresaw the defeat, no analyst had predicted such a large margin for rejection of what would have been one of the most progressive constitutions in the world and would have fundamentally changed the South American country.
“The constitution that was written now leans too far to one side and does not have the vision of all Chileans,” Roberto Briones, 41, said after voting in Chile’s capital of Santiago. “We all want a new constitution, but it needs to have a better structure.”
But others had fervently hoped it would pass and wipe away strong vestiges of the dictatorship.
Mr. Boric, 36, is Chile’s youngest-ever president and a former student protest leader. He had tied his fortunes so closely to the new document that analysts said it was likely some voters saw the plebiscite as a referendum on his government at a time when his approval ratings have been plunging since he took office in March.
Chilean political leaders of all stripes agree the constitution, which dates from the country’s 1973-90 dictatorship, must change. But just how will likely be the subject of hard-fought negotiations within the country’s political leadership.
The vote marked the climax of a process that began when the country once seen as a paragon of stability in the region exploded in student-led street protests in 2019. The unrest was sparked by a hike in public transportation prices, but it quickly expanded into broader demands for greater equality and more social protections.
The following year, just under 80 per cent of Chileans voted in favour of changing the constitution. Then in 2021, they elected delegates to a constitutional convention.
The 388-article proposed charter, besides focusing on social issues and the environment, also introduced rights to free education, health care and housing. It would have established autonomous Indigenous territories and recognized a parallel justice system in those areas, although lawmakers would decide how far-reaching that would be.
In contrast, the current constitution is a market-friendly document that favours the private sector over the state in aspects such as education, pensions and health care. It also makes no reference to the country’s Indigenous population, which makes up almost 13 per cent of the overall population.
Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.
This content appears as provided to The Globe by the originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.