Skip to main content

Hong Kong chief executive Carrie Lam speaks at a press conference in Hong Kong on Sept. 3, 2019.

The Associated Press

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said on Tuesday she had never asked the Chinese government to let her resign to end the Chinese-ruled city’s political crisis, responding to a report about a recording of her saying she would step down if she could.

China for its part expressed confidence in Lam and her government, but said it would not sit idly by if the unrest threatened Chinese security and sovereignty.

Hundreds of thousands of people have taken to the streets of the former British colony since mid-June in sometimes violent protests against now-suspended draft legislation that could have seen people sent to mainland China for trial in Communist Party controlled courts.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Lam told business leaders last week that she had caused “unforgivable havoc” by introducing the bill, and that if she had a choice she would apologize and resign, according to a leaked audio recording.

Ms. Lam told a televised news conference that she had never considered asking to resign and that Beijing believed her government could solve the three-month-long crisis without China’s intervention.

“I have not even contemplated discussing a resignation with the central people’s government. The choice of resigning, it’s my own choice,” Ms. Lam said.

“I told myself repeatedly in the last three months that I and my team should stay on to help Hong Kong. … That’s why I said that I have not given myself the choice to take an easier path and that is to leave.”

Ms. Lam added that she was disappointed that comments made in a private meeting, where she had been sharing the “journey of my heart,” had been leaked.

At a news conference given by China’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office in Beijing, no questions were raised directly about the Lam tape, and a spokesman and spokeswoman did not refer to it.

They denounced the violence and Western countries seeking to use the Hong Kong issue to interfere in China’s affairs, and reiterated that China would never tolerate Hong Kong independence or a leader who was not loyal to Beijing.

Story continues below advertisement

The central government firmly supported Ms. Lam and her government, they said. But it would not sit by forever if the violence continued, spokeswoman Xu Luying said.

“The central government will not allow chaos in Hong Kong to continue indefinitely,” she said.

“If the situation in Hong Kong continues to worsen and it becomes turmoil that cannot be controlled by the SAR government, and endangers the country’s sovereignty and security, the central government will not sit idly by.”

SAR refers to the “special administrative region” of Hong Kong.

The Global Times, a widely read Chinese tabloid published by the ruling Communist Party’s official People’s Daily, denounced the story in an editorial on their website.

“Reuters and other Western media have been entangled in the fake news that ‘Carrie Lam’s resignation has not been approved’ for some time, a serious infringement of the bottom line of professional ethics.

Story continues below advertisement

“They are not objectively reporting facts.”

The growing unrest in Hong Kong has evolved into a broader call for Hong Kong to be granted greater autonomy by Beijing, which has often accused foreign powers, particularly the United States and Britain, of fomenting the unrest.

Comments on the story about Ms. Lam appeared to be censored on mainland Chinese social media, although state media covered Ms. Lam’s news conference.

In the audio recording, Ms. Lam said that her ability to resolve the crisis was “very, very limited”, as she had to serve “two masters” and the issue had been elevated “to a national level,” a reference to the leadership in Beijing.

But Ms. Lam said on Tuesday that her government had the confidence of Beijing and could bring an end to unrest itself.

Hong Kong school and university students boycotted classes and held rallies for a second straight day, calling for what protesters call their “five demands.”

Story continues below advertisement

Other than the formal withdrawal of the extradition bill, protesters want the retraction of the word “riot” to describe rallies, the release of all arrested demonstrators, an independent inquiry into the police and the right for Hongkongers to democratically choose their own leaders.

Under Hong Kong law, rioting can carry a 10-year prison sentence.

Ms. Lam has said she is open to dialogue with protesters but has made no concessions on these demands.

“I think Carrie Lam doesn’t have much power,” said Poon, a 21-year-old engineering student at Hong Kong University.

“No matter she can step down or not, it doesn’t matter. Chief executive is still chosen by the central government. What matters is she refuses to respond to the five demands. She’s an irresponsible leader.”

The weekend was marred by some of the worst violence since the unrest escalated more than three months ago, with protesters burning barricades and throwing petrol bombs, and police retaliating with water cannon, tear gas and batons.

Story continues below advertisement

Thousands of protesters blocked roads and public-transport links to Hong Kong airport on Sunday. Some then targeted the MTR subway station in nearby Tung Chung, ripping out turnstiles and smashing CCTV cameras, glass panels and lamps with metal poles.

Police have arrested more than 1,140 people since the protests began, including high-profile activists such as Joshua Wong, one of the leaders of the pro-democracy “Umbrella” movement five years ago that foreshadowed the current unrest.

Hong Kong returned to China in 1997 under a “one country, two systems” formula that guarantees wide-ranging autonomy, including the right to protest and an independent judiciary.

The protesters fear those freedoms are being slowly eroded by Beijing, a charge China vehemently denies, saying China is its business and no one else’s.

With Hong Kong facing its first recession in a decade, speculation has grown that the city government may impose emergency laws, giving it extra powers over detentions, censorship and curfews.

Ms. Lam said her government was considering all legal avenues to solve the crisis.

This content appears as provided to The Globe by the originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter