The jury in the fraud trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort ended its first day of deliberations with a series of questions to the judge, including a request to “redefine” reasonable doubt.
The questions came after roughly seven hours of deliberation, delivered in a handwritten note to U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III. Judge Ellis read the questions aloud to lawyers for both sides as well as Mr. Manafort before he called the jury in to give his answers.
Along with the question on reasonable doubt, the jury asked about the list of exhibits, rules for reporting foreign bank accounts and the definition of “shelf companies,” a term used during the trial to describe some of the foreign companies used by Mr. Manafort.
Judge Ellis told the jurors they need to rely on their collective memory of the evidence to answer most questions. As for reasonable doubt, he described it as “a doubt based on reason” and told jurors it does not require proof “beyond all doubt.”
The jury concluded deliberations around 5:30 p.m. after receiving Judge Ellis’s answers. Deliberations will resume Friday at 9:30 a.m.
Jurors began their deliberations Thursday morning in the case against Mr. Manafort, who prosecutors say earned US$60-million advising Russia-backed politicians in Ukraine, hid much of it from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and then lied to banks to get loans when the money dried up.
Mr. Manafort’s defence countered that he wasn’t culpable because he left the particulars of his finances to others.
The financial fraud trial calls on the dozen jurors to follow the complexities of foreign bank accounts and shell companies, loan regulations and tax rules. It exposed details about the lavish lifestyle of the onetime political insider, including a US$15,000 jacket made of ostrich leather and US$900,000 spent at a boutique retailer in New York via international wire transfer.
It’s the first courtroom test of the continuing Russia probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller. While allegations of collusion are still being investigated, evidence of bank fraud and tax evasion unearthed during the probe has cast doubt on the integrity U.S. President Donald Trump’s closest advisers during the campaign.
“When you follow the trail of Mr. Manafort’s money, it is littered with lies,” prosecutor Greg Andres said in his final argument Wednesday, asking the jury to convict Mr. Manafort of 18 felony counts.
In his defence, Mr. Manafort’s lawyers told jurors to question the entirety of the prosecution’s case as they sought to tarnish the credibility of his long-time protege – and government witness – Rick Gates.
The government says Mr. Manafort hid at least US$16-million in income from the IRS between 2010-14. Prosecutors say Mr. Manafort declared only some of his foreign income on his federal income tax returns and repeatedly failed to disclose millions of dollars that streamed into the United States to pay for luxury items, services and property.