Outgoing European Council President Donald Tusk looks on as he addresses the media after the EU leaders struck a deal on the bloc's top jobs, during the third day of an EU summit, in Brussels, on July 2, 2019.GEOFFROY VAN DER HASSELT/AFP/Getty Images
After three days of arduous negotiations, European Union leaders broke a deadlock Tuesday and nominated German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen to become the new president of the bloc’s powerful executive arm, the European Commission, one of two women named to top EU posts for the first time.
In a series of tweets, European Council President Donald Tusk said that Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel would take over from him in the fall.
Frenchwoman Christine Lagarde was proposed as president of the European Central Bank, while Spanish Foreign Minister Josep Borrell was nominated to become EU foreign policy chief, meaning he would be charged with supervising the Iran nuclear deal, among other duties.
Only Mr. Michel can take up his post without other formalities. The others, notably Ms. von der Leyen – who will take over from Jean-Claude Juncker for the next five years – must be endorsed by the European Parliament. The assembly sits in Strasbourg, France, on Wednesday to elect its own new president and early signs suggest that lawmakers could contest the nominations.
“It is important that we were able to decide with great unity today, and that is important because it’s about our future ability to work.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters after the nominations – decided away from the cameras and media in a long series of meetings – were made public.
Several lawmakers have already objected to the leaders’ package of nominations, and it remains to be seen whether the parliament will flex new found muscles following the massive turnout for EU-wide elections in May. Party leaders have said the vote has brought the assembly – the EU’s only elected institution – even more democratic legitimacy.
“This backroom stitch-up after days of talks is grotesque,” said Greens group leader Ska Keller, describing the nomination process as “party power games.”
“After such a high turnout in the European elections and a real mandate for change, this is not what European citizens deserve,” said Ms. Keller, who is in the running to become parliament president on Wednesday.
Mr. Juncker, who steps down on Oct. 31 as head of the commission, which proposes and enforces EU laws, conceded that “it won’t be easy in parliament.”
Mr. Tusk said “it was worth waiting for such an outcome” and that he would do his best to explain to what could well be a tetchy parliament on Thursday how the nominations were made and what thought processes went into the move.
“It’s always a huge question mark. This is why we have parliaments,” Mr. Tusk said, with a wry smile.
Ms. Von der Leyen would be the first woman in the commission job, and Mr. Merkel said this is “a good sign.”
So would Ms. Lagarde – currently chair of the International Monetary Fund – and she would serve for up to eight years if her nomination is endorsed.
“That’s a very important statement that Europe leads on gender equality,” Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said.
“It might have taken three days, but it’s a good outcome overall,” he told reporters.
The nominations came after one of the longest summits in recent years, outstripping even all-night negotiations during the Greek debt crisis.
Already plagued by crises such as Brexit and deep divisions among countries over how best to manage migration, the leaders had been keen to show that they could take quick decisions and that the European project remains important to its citizens.
But they struggled to establish a delicate balance between population size and geography – an even mix of countries from the north and south, east and west, and ensure that at least two women were nominated. Mr. Tusk he said he hoped that someone from a central or eastern European member state would be voted in as president of the European Parliament.
Despite deep tensions, some tantrums by leaders behind the scenes and even public criticism of his handling of the summit, Mr. Tusk said: “Five years ago, we needed three months to decide and still some leaders were against. This year it was three days and nobody was against.”
The Belgian prime minister said that he understands the challenges that lie ahead.
“The next five years will be very important for the future of the European project and I am convinced that it will be very important to protect and to promote our unity, our diversity and especially also our solidarity,” Mr. Michel told reporters, after one of the most acrimonious summits in recent memory.
Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.