Skip to main content

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a session of the lower house of parliament to consider constitutional changes that will enable him to circumvent a prohibition on serving more than two consecutive terms as leader, on March 10, 2020.

SPUTNIK/Reuters

Russia looks headed for up to 16 more years of Vladimir Putin’s authoritarianism, after the country’s parliament adopted constitutional changes Tuesday that would reset the clock on his time in the Kremlin and allow him to get around a prohibition on serving more than two consecutive terms.

The fact that Russia is already under de facto one-man rule could be seen in the choreographed way Tuesday unfolded. The changes were proposed by a member of a pro-Putin party, then unanimously passed into law by the Duma – as Russia’s parliament is known – within a matter of hours, after Mr. Putin made a surprise visit to show his support for the elimination of term limits.

The Russian President is consolidating his power as Russia, embroiled in conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, is bracing for the possibility of a sharp economic downturn. The ruble plunged almost 10 per cent Monday before recovering slightly Tuesday amid an oil price war with Saudi Arabia.

Story continues below advertisement

Until Tuesday, the 67-year-old Mr. Putin – who has been either president or prime minister since before the turn of the century – was barred from running again for the presidency in 2024, when his six-year term expires. Forty-seven years old when an ailing Boris Yeltsin first installed him as the country’s acting president, Mr. Putin could now still be in office when he’s 83. Such a reign would see him surpass Joseph Stalin to become Russia’s longest-serving ruler since Peter the Great.

The only remaining hurdle is an April 22 referendum on a raft of proposed changes to the constitution. The Kremlin is expected to easily win the vote against scattered opposition.

While there has long been speculation that Mr. Putin intended to remain in the Kremlin beyond 2024, Tuesday’s moves nonetheless came as something of a surprise. Under the proposed constitutional changes, which Mr. Putin put forward in January, the presidency will be weakened, with more power given to the Duma and an unelected body, the State Council.

However, Tuesday’s events demonstrate that the Duma, in its current form, poses little challenge to Mr. Putin. The motion to extend Mr. Putin’s time in office was initially proposed by Valentina Tereshkova, a member of the United Russia party, which is by far the biggest faction in parliament and has no agenda other than to support Mr. Putin.

After Ms. Tereshkova made her proposal, Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said Mr. Putin needed to be consulted on such a dramatic change. Shortly afterward – and clearly unsurprised by what was unfolding – the President appeared to lend the motion his support.

In a brief speech, he said that as President he was “the guarantor of the country’s security, domestic stability and … evolutionary development – I repeat, evolutionary development, because we have had enough revolutions.”

Without naming them, he pointed to “neighbours” that had removed their presidential term limits, a reference that could have applied to China, where the Communist Party has cleared the way for President Xi Jinping to remain in office beyond the end of his term in 2023, or former Soviet republics such as Belarus, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2008, at the end of his first two terms as president, Mr. Putin flipped jobs with his ally Dmitry Medvedev, becoming prime minister while Mr. Medvedev assumed the presidency. Mr. Putin reportedly chafed at his reduced power and seems unwilling to repeat the experiment.

Sergey Utkin, the head of strategic assessment at the Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, said Tuesday’s changes did not mean Mr. Putin intended to run again for president in 2024 – only that he was giving himself the option of doing so.

“People [have] started speaking about Putin till 2036, but he himself … doesn’t know the circumstances – including his health condition – years into the future,” Mr. Utkin said. “His primary concern probably was to avoid him becoming the lame duck constrained by the constitution in the next few years.”

Sergey Markov, a Kremlin-connected political analyst who previously served as a United Russia MP, told The Globe and Mail that Mr. Putin wasn’t planning to retain power for life – but did intend to remain in power until the end of Russia’s conflict with the West. “If the U.S. and EU stop the war against Russia, Putin will leave the post,” Mr. Markov said, referring to the economic sanctions imposed on the country to punish it for its annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Others, however, said they could clearly see the writing on the wall. “All is clear,” Alexey Navalny, Russia’s top opposition figure, posted on his Twitter account. “Putin will be president for life.”

Mr. Navalny predicted the Kremlin will prevent mass demonstrations around the April 22 referendum by using the threat of the coronavirus to ban public gatherings – even though there have only been 17 confirmed cases so far in Russia.

Story continues below advertisement

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies