Skip to main content

President Donald Trump pauses during a Christmas Eve video teleconference with members of the military at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla., on Dec. 24, 2019.

Andrew Harnik/The Associated Press

Donald Trump retweeted a post that included the alleged name of the anonymous whistle-blower whose complaint ultimately led to the U.S. President’s impeachment by the House.

Just before midnight Friday, Mr. Trump retweeted a message from Twitter user Surfermom77, an account that claims to be a woman named Sophia who lives in California. The account shows some indications of automation, including an unusually high amount of activity and profile pictures featuring stock images from the internet.

By Saturday morning, the post seemed to have disappeared on many users’ feeds, suggesting Mr. Trump had deleted it, though it could still be found in other ways, including on a website that logs every presidential tweet.

Story continues below advertisement

The retweet then reappeared Saturday night. Twitter told The Associated Press that an outage with one of its systems caused tweets on some accounts, including Mr. Trump’s, to be visible to some but not others.

Mr. Trump has repeatedly backed efforts to unmask the whistle-blower. But his Friday night retweet marks the first time he has directly sent the alleged name into the Twitter feed of his 68 million followers.

Unmasking the whistle-blower, who works in the intelligence field, could violate federal protection laws that have historically been supported by both parties.

The whistle-blower filed a complaint in August about one of Mr. Trump’s telephone conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and other dealings with the Eastern European country. The complaint prompted House Democrats to launch a probe that ended with Mr. Trump’s impeachment earlier this month. The matter now heads to the Senate, where the Republican majority is expected to acquit the President.

The central points from the whistle-blower’s complaint were confirmed during the House impeachment hearings by a string of diplomats and other career officials, many of whom testified in public. The White House also released a transcript of Mr. Trump’s July 25 phone call with Mr. Zelenskiy, in which he asks for help investigating former U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden and the Democratic National Committee.

Speculation about the whistle-blower’s identity has been circulating in conservative media and on social media for months.

U.S. whistle-blower laws exist to protect the identity and careers of people who bring forward accusations of wrongdoing by government officials. The Associated Press typically does not reveal the identity of whistle-blowers.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Trump insists he did nothing wrong in his dealings with Ukraine and has asserted that the whistle-blower made up the complaint, despite its corroboration by other officials. Mr. Trump also argues that he has a right to face his accuser and has called on the whistle-blower to step forward.

For months, an array of right-wing personalities, amateur pro-Trump internet sleuths and some conservative news outlets have published what they claim to be details about the whistle-blower, including name and career history. The President himself has also been inching closer to outing the individual; earlier this week, Mr. Trump shared a tweet linking to a Washington Examiner article that included the alleged name.

Surfermom77, the Twitter handle on the post Mr. Trump retweeted, describes herself as a “100%Trump Supporter” and California resident. The account had nearly 79,000 followers as of Saturday afternoon. Some of its previous posts have denounced Islam and sharply criticized former U.S. president Barack Obama and other Democrats.

Surfermom77 has displayed some hallmarks of a Twitter bot, an automated account. A recent profile picture on the account, for instance, is a stock photo of a woman in business attire that is available for use online.

That photo was removed Saturday and replaced with an image of Mr. Trump.

A deeper look at Surfermom77’s account shows the user previously used two other stock photos as profile pictures, including one of a model wearing an orange hat used by a hat retailer.

Story continues below advertisement

Surfermom77 has also tweeted far more than typical users, more than 170,000 times since the account was activated in 2013. Surfermom77 has posted, on average, 72 tweets a day, according to Nir Hauser, chief technology officer at VineSight, a technology firm that tracks online misinformation.

“That’s not something most humans are doing,” Mr. Hauser said.

While many bots only repost benign information such as cat photos, others have been used to spread disinformation or polarizing claims, as Russian bots did in the lead up to the 2016 U.S. election.

In past years, Surfermom77 has described herself as a teacher, historian, documentary author and model. Attempts to reach the person behind the account by telephone on Saturday were unsuccessful. An e-mail address could not be found.

Facebook has a policy banning posts that name the alleged whistle-blower. But Twitter, which doesn’t have such a rule, has not removed the tweet from Supermom77 or tweets from others who have named the alleged whistle-blower.

“The Tweet you referenced is not a violation of the Twitter Rules,” the company wrote in an e-mailed statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Some details about the whistle-blower that have been published online by Mr. Trump’s supporters have been inaccurate or misrepresented.

For example, a photo shared widely on social media last month was circulated by Facebook, Reddit and Twitter users who wrongly claimed it showed the whistle-blower with Mr. Obama’s staffers outside the White House as Mr. Trump moved in.

The individual in the photo actually was R. David Edelman, a former special assistant to Mr. Obama on economic and tech policy. Mr. Edelman debunked the claim on his Twitter account and said he received threats online as a result of the false claims.

Michael German, an FBI whistle-blower who left the agency after reporting allegations of mismanagement in counterterrorism cases, said outing government whistle-blowers not only puts them at personal risk but also discourages other government officials from stepping forward to expose possible wrongdoing.

Mr. German, now a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, said the ease with which the alleged whistle-blower’s identity has been spread online shows the need for greater legal protections for whistle-blowers.

He added that it’s “completely inappropriate for the President of the United States to be engaged in any type of behaviour that could harm a whistle-blower.”

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies