Skip to main content

White House plays another round of defence on Russia as it leaves door open to handing over U.S. citizens

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting in the White House in Washington on Wednesday, July 18, 2018.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/The Associated Press

The White House is leaving open the possibility that President Donald Trump will hand over 10 U.S. citizens – including a former ambassador to Russia – to the Kremlin to face criminal charges as part of Vladimir Putin’s attempts to take down an anti-corruption campaigner.

Such a move, according to politicians on both sides of the aisle, would be extraordinary: The United States turning its own officials over to the autocratic leader of a rival country who wants to put them in prison.

The assertion by the U.S. President’s spokeswoman came as the Trump administration continued to struggle to contain the fallout from the Helsinki summit, where he embraced the Russian President, refusing to condemn him for allegedly interfering in the U.S. election and seeming to believe Mr. Putin’s denials that he did anything wrong.

Story continues below advertisement

At one point on Wednesday, the U.S. President appeared to deny Russia was still targeting the United States’ electoral system – contradicting his own intelligence officials – before the White House said he had simply been misunderstood.

And the night before, he seemed to muse in an interview that it might not be a good idea for the United States to adhere to its North Atlantic Treaty Organization obligations to defend any ally that was attacked.

CEO of Hermitage Capital Management Bill Browder, a former Moscow financier turned anti-Kremlin activist.

ROBIN VAN LONKHUIJSEN/Getty Images

Russia’s demand is related to Mr. Putin’s long-running fight with Bill Browder, a financier who has successfully lobbied the United States and other countries to impose sanctions on Russian officials as punishment for corruption and human-rights abuses.

Opinion: How Russia wields prisons as a weapon against its political opponents

The Kremlin wants to charge 10 Americans, including former ambassador Michael McFaul, as part of what Russia says was plot orchestrated by Mr. Browder to embarrass the Kremlin. Russia has also demanded the handover of two British nationals: Mr. Browder himself, and former spy Christopher Steele.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Mr. Trump’s spokeswoman, confirmed at a media briefing Wednesday that Mr. Putin had raised his request directly with the President during their summit on Monday. She said Mr. Trump was thinking it over.

“The President’s going to meet with his team and we’ll let you know when we have an announcement on that,” she said. “There was some conversation about it, but there wasn’t a commitment made on behalf of the United States, and the President will work with his team and we’ll let you know.”

Story continues below advertisement

Within an hour, the State Department put out a different message.

“The overall assertions that have come out of the Russian government are absolutely absurd. The fact that they want to question … American citizens,” spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters.

Whether Ms. Huckabee Sanders was seriously suggesting the American citizens were in danger of being given to Russia, or whether she was caught off-guard by the question and trying to deflect it was not immediately clear. But she drew fire for not delivering a more standard answer – that the United States does not help autocratic regimes prosecute its citizens.

Rick Wilson, a Republican strategist, tweeted that another president “would have issued a declaration that when it came to protecting Michael McFaul and Bill Browder that Vladimir Putin could pack sand.”

Adam Schiff, a Democratic member of Congress, said the very idea had to be dismissed out of hand. “No ‘consultation’ is needed to make clear that U.S. will never cooperate in Putin’s crusade against Bill Browder or former U.S. officials, like Ambassador McFaul,” he tweeted.

Ms. Huckabee Sanders did, however, try to tamp down another Russia-related conflagration: Earlier on Wednesday, ahead of a cabinet meeting, after a reporter asked Mr. Trump whether Russia was still targeting the United States, Mr. Trump said “no.” The assertion ran counter to the comments of Mr. Trump’s director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, who said last week that “the warning lights are blinking red” as Russia goes after the U.S. government and business.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Huckabee Sanders said Mr. Trump had not been answering the question, but had been saying “no” to speaking with reporters.

Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump first hinted at the Kremlin’s request at a joint news conference on Monday. Mr. Putin said he would allow special counsel Robert Mueller to visit Russia to observe as Russian officials interrogated Russian spies Mr. Mueller has indicted for allegedly interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election – but wanted something in exchange. Mr. Trump praised the offer as “incredible.”

Mr. McFaul said he was “just shocked” that the White House seemed to be considering Mr. Putin’s proposed swap.

“I’m deeply disgusted. I don’t understand why the continuing to assign moral equivalency between a genuine indictment of Russian intelligence officers, and a cockamamie, crazy, false, scheme that implicates me and several other U.S. government officials in something that didn’t happen,” he said in an interview.

Mr. McFaul was the U.S. ambassador to Moscow during a series of protests in 2012 that briefly threatened Mr. Putin’s grip on power. Mr. Putin personally blamed Mr. McFaul and then-U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton for instigating the uprising.

In another controversial assertion, Mr. Trump mused in a Fox News interview aired late Tuesday that Montenegro – a country of 640,000 people – was “very aggressive” and could start World War Three. In such a case, he suggested, the United States may be better off not getting involved, even though Montenegro is a member of NATO that has fought to free itself from Russian influence.

By Wednesday evening, Mr. Trump was insisting that, contrary to his public comments with Mr. Putin, he had actually told the Russian President privately to stop meddling in U.S. elections.

“I let him know we can’t have this. We’re not going to have it, and that’s the way it’s going to be,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with CBS. He said he held Mr. Putin personally responsible if there was more meddling in future. “I would, because he’s in charge of the country.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter