Skip to main content

Film Reviews The Salt of the Earth: Sebastiao Salgado’s walk through catastrophe

The Salt of the Earth explores the photography of Sebastiao Salgado.

©Sebastiao Salgado/Amazonas/Amazonas images

3 out of 4 stars

Written by
Wim Wenders, Juliano Ribeiro Salgado, David Rosier, Camille Delafon
Directed by
Wim Wenders and Juliano Ribeiro Salgado
Classification
PG
Country
USA
Language
English

This much we know: The photographer takes the picture. Less clear is the reverse process – what the picture takes back. And this, to a large and illuminating extent, is the subject of Wim Wenders's The Salt of the Earth.

For more than 40 years now, the Brazilian-born photographer Sebastiao Salgado has been taking pictures of the horrors that people are capable of: mass starvation and enforced migration, ethnic cleansing, wholesale ecological and economic catastrophe. Ethiopia, Rwanda, Kuwait, Yugoslavia. With his camera, Salgado has travelled to all these places in the teeth of their misery, and the pictures he has taken – black-and-white, monumental, often so aesthetically accomplished they confound our notions of beauty – comprise an act of witnessing that is history on its own.

While Jennifer Baichwal's ravishing 2006 Edward Burtynsky documentary Manufactured Landscapes offers inevitable comparison, Wenders's portrait of the photographer as witness to disaster is considerably less interested in process than personality. Although The Salt of the Earth makes Salgado's technical and artistic skills abundantly apparent, and nowhere more so than when he bemoans a walrus herd frightened by a polar bear into a compositionally dull cluster, it's the toll taken by the art on the artist that the filmmaker himself stalks.

Story continues below advertisement

Both an accomplished still photographer and conscientious global wanderer in his own right, the German-born Wenders (Paris Texas, Buena Vista Social Club, Pina) is fully aware of the built-in redundancy of a film about photography, that more than moving pictures are required to make a movie.

And this, fittingly enough, Wenders finds in Salgado's eyes. Looking directly into the camera, Salgado – now in his early 70s – seems to be staring straight at us until you notice something. As he talks with such startling clarity and precision of the photographs he has taken, his eyes are scanning. And it may take you a moment or two to realize what's going on: As he's being interviewed, he's looking at the same photographs, projected on glass, that we are. And as he's looking at the pictures, we're looking into him.

The tactic might not be the only one at work in The Salt of the Earth – there are also more standard passages, such as archival biographical still montages, scenes of Salgado at work in the field and talking-head interviews with the photographer's aged father – but these direct-to-camera testimonials are the movie's troubled heart, and raise the inescapable question of what happens to a soul when it gets to the point where it's simply seen too much.

Dedicated as he's been to documenting human misery and atrocity, Salgado is a man who's been spiritually broken by his art. At one point, lost in his own images of Rwanda, he even suggests that "no one deserves to live."

But in Brazil, on the farm where he grew up and is reunited with his family (including his filmmaker son, and Salt co-director, Juliano Ribeiro Salgado), Wenders observes his subject's restoration to something like hope, a spiritual reboot rooted in the effort of bringing life back to a dead land. With his wife Leila, Saldago starts a massive project of environmental restoration on the farm.

In a sense, it's as happy an ending of any movie you're likely to see this year, a stirring suggestion that not only can the Earth be saved from disaster, but life can appear where death once prevailed and a shattered heart put back together again. But as irresistible as that sentiment may be, and as powerfully rendered by Wenders as a kind of Edenic rebirth, it can't quite shake what has come before. I don't doubt that life and colour can be restored to the dry and cracked hills of Saldago's family farm. But can they possibly erase what his eyes, and ours, have already seen?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter