Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Ted Sutherland, left, and Sadie Sink star in Fear Street Part 2: 1978.

Netflix

Plan your screen time with the weekly What to Watch newsletter. Sign up today.

Fear Street Part Two: 1978

Directed by Leigh Janiak

Story continues below advertisement

Written by Phil Graziadei and Leigh Janiak, based on the book series by R.L. Stine

Starring Sadie Sink, Emily Rudd and Gillian Jacobs

Classification R; 109 minutes

Last week, when Netflix released the first entry in its Fear Street horror trilogy, I moaned that it was unreasonable to judge a series designed to be enjoyed as a whole when only a single entry was available for review. Maybe, I hoped, the wobblier elements of Part One: 1994 would make more solid cinematic sense after viewing Part Two: 1978 and Part Three: 1666. Well, scratch that – and make sure to do so with as giant a butcher knife as possible.

While Part One stands as a fine-enough ode to the slasher renaissance of the mid-1990s – mostly because of a few nifty murders that Wes Craven would be proud of – Part Two proves that the entire Fear Street enterprise could have easily kept its time-hopping ambitions to a two-hour kill fest.

Opening seconds after the end of Part One, in which a group of clever teens discover that their suburban town has long been under the curse of a witch, Part Two takes a few breaths to recap the nineties-era mayhem before flashbacking a decade and a half to the summer of 1978. Now we’re at Camp Nightwing, where two short-shorted teenage sisters (Sadie Sink and Emily Rudd) must battle the same witch – a kind of backward thriller situation, given that Part One already told us how this particular chapter ends. (Hint: badly.)

In addition to this tension-sapping narrative decision, the big and bloody problem with Part Two is that, by making a horror flick set at a 1970s summer camp with a contemporary perspective and budget, director Leigh Janiak has set herself up for failure.

Story continues below advertisement

The sleepaway-slaughter hallmarks of the 1980s such as The Burning, Friday the 13th, Madman, Sleepaway Camp and Cheerleader Camp belonged to a disreputable, sleazy sub-genre that cannot be genuinely replicated by such mainstream studios as Fox (which produced Fear Street) and Netflix (which eventually bought the films). It’s not that Part Two is allergic to sex and violence – it’s just that all the bad behaviour can’t help but feel sanitized and too close to “safe” in today’s well-funded, needle-drop-eager hands.

If you’re going to make a movie in which a psycho slices away at both campers and counsellors in direct homage to the age of Jason Voorhees, you need to go scuzzy or go home. A proper slasher movie should make you want to take a shower. Here, I felt sparkling clean.

If you – or more likely the under-13 crowd in your home who have ready workarounds to Netflix’s parental controls – have already become hooked on Fear Street, then Part Two provides cheap-enough thrills. (Look, a dude’s butt! Look, that same dude’s butt getting hacked to pieces!) But barring some gigantic shift in ambition and vision in the forthcoming Part Three, Fear Street is a cul-de-sac of a horror franchise: All roads lead to nowhere.

Fear Street Part Two: 1978 is available to stream on Netflix starting July 9

In the interest of consistency across all critics’ reviews, The Globe has eliminated its star-rating system in film and theatre to align with coverage of music, books, visual arts and dance. Instead, works of excellence will be noted with a Critic’s Pick designation across all coverage.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies