Skip to main content

Sacha Baron Cohen, left, and Jeremy Strong star in The Trial of the Chicago 7.

Niko Tavernise/Netflix

  • The Trial of the Chicago 7
  • Written and directed by Aaron Sorkin
  • Starring Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne and Mark Rylance
  • Classification R; 129 minutes

rating

3.5 out of 4 stars

3.5 stars

There are two battles being waged in Aaron Sorkin’s The Trial of the Chicago 7. The first is the people v. Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, Lee Weiner and Bobby Seale – the so-called Chicago 7 (yes, there are eight men; we’ll get to that) who were charged by the U.S. federal government with conspiracy to incite a riot during anti-Vietnam War protests at the 1968 Democratic National Convention. The second fight involves the case of Sorkin v. Sorkin, in which the famously verbose and quick-witted screenwriter, and now director, must battle his own worst instincts while dramatizing the Chicago 7′s legal battle.

For the defence: Across plays (A Few Good Men), television series (Sports Night, The West Wing) and film (Moneyball, The Social Network), Sorkin has mastered the art of the sizzling script. His dialogue is paced at the intensity of a jackhammer, and every other sentence uttered ends on a twist of the one that came before it. His characters are the brightest, slickest people you will ever meet, and whether you’re meant to love or loathe them, Sorkin has a genuine talent for ensuring his heroes and villains will forever stick in your head, wandering the recesses of your mind in an eternal walk-and-talk formation.

Story continues below advertisement

As Abbie Hoffman, Baron Cohen offers a fully rendered portrait of a radical facing the giant that is the U.S. government.

Niko Tavernise/Netflix

For the prosecution: Across plays (To Kill a Mockingbird), television series (Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, The Newsroom) and film (Charlie Wilson’s War), Sorkin has mastered the art of exasperating smugness. Even if your politics align with Sorkin’s left-tilt mindset, the writer’s tendency to finger-wag can send the most self-righteous liberal running to Trump country. It is one thing to bask in the supreme confidence of someone who is convinced they are unimpeachable, another to withstand Sorkin at his most cheesily, naively idealistic, a quality that can turn his well-intentioned endeavours into unbearable and unintentional acts of self-parody.

Luckily for the republic (ie., Netflix subscribers), the Globe and Mail’s court is going to side with the first Sorkin in The Trial of The Chicago 7. While his new film does ever so closely edge toward heart-sinking and eye-rolling earnestness, it is the best kind of Sorkin-y Sorkiness. Every character crackles with a distinct energy, every line is a firebomb, and the murderer’s row of actors enlisted to twist their tongues are fantastic across the board.

Sorkin opens his drama in a straightforward manner, introducing us to the titular seven (really eight; one second) as they head to Chicago to protest the war. There are stoned counterculture leaders Hoffman (Sacha Baron Cohen) and Rubin (Jeremy Strong), student activists Hayden (Eddie Redmayne) and Davis (Alex Sharp), noted pacifist David Dellinger (John Carroll Lynch), plus two low-level protesters Froines (Daniel Flaherty) and Weiner (Noah Robbins), who, as Hoffman later explains, were put on trial to act as conscience-clearers for the jury. As for the eighth man? In a blatant attempt to vilify the Black Panther Party, national chairman Seale (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II) was tossed into the indictment, despite being in Chicago that week for a mere four hours, missing the riot completely.

Strong evokes Otto the Bus Driver from The Simpsons as Jerry Rubin, yet the performance works.

Niko Tavernise/Netflix

In a puzzling move that eventually proves to be canny, Sorkin skips over the actual physical conflict and subsequent arrests, moving straight from his character intros to the start of the trial. Through the men’s conversations with each other, their lawyers (including Mark Rylance as civil rights attorney William Kunstler) and their courtroom testimony, Sorkin pieces together the events of the week, leading up to a bloody confrontation that backward-echoes the police brutality conversation roiling North America today.

In the director’s chair for the second time, Sorkin has just barely improved his visual and editing sensibilities. The movie zips along with far more urgency and glee than the filmmaker’s 2017′s underground-poker drama Molly’s Game, but it still feels shot by someone tasked with making a television pilot. A very expensive and tremendously cast pilot, sure, yet a pilot all the same. There is little visual ingenuity, and so very many medium, eye-level shots. And I’m still trying to forget the clunky cuts to Hoffman’s stand-up routine.

On the subject of Hoffman, though, Baron Cohen proves here that he is just as powerful a dramatic performer as he is a comedic chameleon. The erstwhile Borat struggles with maintaining Hoffman’s American accent, but otherwise offers a fully rendered portrait of a radical facing the giant that is the U.S. government. Paired with any other supporting cast, Baron Cohen would have handily walked away with the movie in the strands of his enormous 'fro. Yet, everybody else dominates the screen, too.

Eddie Redmayne is tremendous as Tom Hayden.

Niko Tavernise/Netflix

Redmayne, who amusingly opts to work his way through Hayden’s American accent by seemingly pretending to chew marbles, is tremendous, especially in a late-film moment where his character’s Boy Scout sheen is tarnished. Strong, best known to fans of HBO’s Succession, plays Rubin like The Simpsons' Otto the Bus Driver – and it works! Abdul-Mateen II, who doesn’t have nearly as much screen time as his colleagues, makes the towering legend of Seale feel achingly human. And the ultra-smooth manner in which Rylance turns Kunstler into the film’s true hero deserves its own 10,000-word appreciation essay.

Story continues below advertisement

The cast – which even finds room for a cameoing Michael Keaton, who delivers a genuine stand-up-and-cheer moment – is the 2021 Oscar lineup in one fell swoop. And just in case you don’t think Sorkin knows how lucky he scored, one character mentions early on that the trial is “the Academy Awards of protesting.” Sorkin’s winks are so shameless that you can hear them flutter across your own living room, but that doesn’t make them unenjoyable, either.

Between the performances, the resonant subject matter, and the just-right Sorkin-esqueness of the screenplay, The Trial of the Chicago 7 is the case of the year. Court adjourned.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 opens in select Canadian theatres Oct. 2; it will be available to stream on Netflix starting Oct. 16

Plan your screen time with the weekly What to Watch newsletter. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies