Skip to main content

Review: The Little Stranger is a ghost story in only the faintest, most subtle sense

Ruth Wilson in The Little Stranger.

Nicola Dove/Focus Features

  • The Little Stranger
  • Directed: by Lenny Abrahamson
  • Written: by Lucinda Coxon
  • Starring: Domhnall Gleeson and Ruth Wilson
  • Classification: 14A; 101 minutes

rating

A ghost story in which the ghosts are secondary, Guillermo del Toro’s 2015 drama Crimson Peak was greeted with shrugs and confusion from audiences, who were expecting something more supernatural from cinema’s reigning king of monsters.

That was mostly the fault of marketing, and it’s a fate I fear may also befall The Little Stranger, a new Gothic thriller based on Sarah Waters’s riveting 2009 novel. Taking pace at a dilapidated mansion in 1940s Warwickshire, England, The Little Stranger is a ghost story in only the faintest, most subtle sense. The film’s ostensible hero, a county doctor (Domhnall Gleeson) constantly seems on edge after meeting the past-their-prime family (led by Ruth Wilson) who eke out an existence at the Hundreds Hall, an 18th-century estate.

Strange goings-on plague the house, but Waters’s work – adapted nicely here by Lucinda Coxon and directed with restraint by Lenny Abrahamson, best known for the Oscar-winning Room – is less concerned with obvious scares than the hidden desires that can drive us mad. Gleeson and Wilson deliver tightly-wound performances, while the ending is more chilling, and perhaps perplexing, than audiences might expect.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter