Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Canada’s decades-long drive to establish a national securities regulator came to a halt on Thursday, and business leaders are urging governments of all stripes to restart work on an organization that can better protect investors and make it easier for companies to raise money.

The Capital Markets Authority Implementation Organization (CMAIO) announced it has shut down and laid off its staff, halting work at a five-year-old agency charged with creating a national regulator. Jill Leversage, chair of CMAIO, said in an interview: “Especially with COVID-19, we found that we had completed all of what we had to do. We were also waiting for reforms in legislation in Ontario and B.C. and could not get a timeline on when all sides would align.”

Canada is the only Group of 20 country without a national securities regulator. Each province and territory is responsible for overseeing its own capital markets. For more than three decades, federal Liberal and Conservative leaders have attempted to unite these regional agencies under a national umbrella. The federal Liberals created the CMAIO in 2016, committing $30-million to the project, along with tens of millions of dollars for programs meant to win support from the provinces.

Story continues below advertisement

The federal Finance Department said it was “disappointed” by the CMAIO board’s decision and will restart the project if provinces make the necessary changes to their rules. “The federal government remains committed to working with the provinces and territories to establish a national securities regulator in Canada,” Finance spokeswoman Katherine Cuplinskas said in an e-mail.

“We are disappointed by the board of directors’ decision to temporarily pause the operations of the Capital Markets Authority Implementation Organization,” Ms. Cuplinskas said. " We look forward to the resumption of this important work once participating jurisdictions implement the necessary reforms to their securities legislation.”

Business groups expressed frustration with various governments’ failure to reach agreement on a national project that initially enjoyed broad support.

“This decision on the national securities regulator is emblematic of the challenges we’re facing in Canada, across a host of issues, including interprovincial trade barriers,” said Goldy Hyder, chief executive of the Business Council of Canada, which represents 150 of the country’s largest companies. “We need to get our act together locally, so we are better able to compete globally. Lack of a national regulator has a negative impact on foreign direct investment in Canada, and on capital formation,” Mr. Hyder said.

“We are extremely disappointed that this important initiative has been paused,” said Katie Walmsley, president of the Portfolio Management Association of Canada, which speaks for 290 fund managers with more than $2.8-trillion in assets. She said the benefits of a national regulator are well known and “we remain hopeful that as part of a postpandemic pan-Canadian economic recovery plan, the provinces, territories and the federal government will see fit to relaunch.”

The CMAIO was created to design and build a new co-operative capital markets regulatory system that provinces and territories could voluntarily join. The goal was to streamline regulations to better protect investors, foster efficient capital markets and manage systemic risk, while preserving the strengths of the current system.

After the CMAIO was launched, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador and Yukon signed on. Quebec and Alberta opposed the concept and never joined. Manitoba, Nunavut and Northwest Territories did not join either.

Story continues below advertisement

As subsequent elections brought in new provincial leaders, regimes such as the NDP-led government in B.C. and Ontario’s Progressive Conservatives pulled away from the idea, opting instead to reform provincial regulators.

Maureen Jensen, the former chair and CEO of the Ontario Securities Commission, called the CMAIO’s closing “disappointing but unsurprising” given the headwinds it has faced over the past five years. “I’m actually surprised it took this long to shut down. It was clear that no one was focusing on this during the pandemic, and the organization was essentially powerless because governments put no political capital towards it,” she said in an interview.

Lawrence Ritchie, a partner at Bay Street firm Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, who served a seven-year term as vice-chair of the OSC, also expressed regrets over the disbanding of the CMAIO. “The news is no doubt disappointing to those of us who have spent time travelling down the road towards a pan-national regulator, and hoped that it would have been achieved a long while ago,” he said.

Mr. Ritchie pointed out that Ontario’s recent move to restructure its securities legislation through a new Capital Markets Act drew from some of the work done by the CMAIO. “It’s a boost of confidence to the initiative’s output,” he said.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies