Skip to main content

The Canadian government, companies in the auto sector and a leading U.S. business group have condemned the Trump administration for launching an investigation into whether vehicles imported from Canada, Mexico and other countries represent a security threat to the United States.

The move by the U.S. government targets autos imported from all countries, noting that vehicles made outside the United States captured almost half the U.S. market last year.

Read More: Trump aims at NAFTA allies with imported-vehicle tariffs

The investigation, using legislation from the 1960s that allows the United States to impose tariffs if national security is under threat, has also been used to target imports of steel and aluminum and could lead to tariffs of 25 per cent on vehicles and auto parts shipments to the United States.

Story continues below advertisement

If put in place, such tariffs would cause a substantial increase in the costs of the approximately 1.7 million vehicles and the more than $17-billion worth of parts shipped out of Canada to the United States annually.

“It’s absurd to think that Canada in any way could pose a national security threat to the United States,” Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland said in Ottawa, noting that Canada will resist auto tariffs as it has fought 25 per cent tariffs on steel and 10 per cent levies on aluminum entering the United States from Canada. Canada has an exemption from those tariffs that expires next Friday.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters he believes the U.S. threat is related to negotiations to transform the North American free-trade agreement, where Canada and Mexico have forced U.S. negotiators to drop some automotive demands and reduce others. But the talks are deadlocked in part on Mexico’s refusal to agree a certain percentage of vehicles be made in high-wage regions in order to qualify for duty-free shipment within North America.

“Obviously trying to find what would be the link between the national security of the United States and cars that would be made in Ontario, it is starting to be less and less relevant or justified in terms of logic and intellectual rigour,” Mr. Trudeau said with an audible sigh.

Linda Hasenfratz, chief executive officer of Linamar Corp., Canada’s second-largest auto parts company by revenue, said the suggestion that vehicles from Canada and Mexico are a security threat is “ludicrous.”

Tariffs will add cost, which will drive up prices, reduce demand and potentially lead to a recession, Ms. Hasenfratz said in an e-mailed statement.

“President [Donald] Trump needs to stop playing games and start supporting the American economy with positive action.”

Story continues below advertisement

Shares of Linamar, and Canada’s other large publicly traded auto-parts makers, Magna International Inc. and Martinrea International Inc., fell on the news.

A sport utility vehicle Magna assembles for Mercedes-Benz in Austria would be subject to the tariff.

Five auto makers – two based in Japan, two in Detroit and one in Italy – assembled 2.18 million vehicles in Canada last year. They exported about 85 per cent of those to the United States, although the number varies by company.

Toyota Motor Corp. which is the largest vehicle assembler by volume in Canada, said the threat of tariffs has not changed its plans to invest $1.4-billion in assembly plants in Cambridge, Ont. and Woodstock, Ont.

Toyota has invested more than US$23-billion in the United States, so a determination that its vehicles harm U.S. national security seems “implausible,” a spokeswoman said in an e-mail from the company’s North American headquarters in Plano, Tex.

There was no comment from the Detroit-based companies Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. or from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV or their Canadian organization, the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association.

Story continues below advertisement

But such companies, which have large assembly operations in Mexico and Canada, will be harmed if their imports from the two countries are subject to tariffs, said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association of Canada.

“Section 232 tariffs on light vehicles made in Canada are going to punish American companies, American suppliers and American customers,” Mr. Volpe said. “That’s not smart.”

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce blasted the move, saying the President’s national security powers were being “abused” purely to ratchet up the pressure at the bargaining table.

“The administration has already signalled its true objective is to leverage this tariff threat in trade negotiations with Mexico, Canada, Japan, the European Union, and South Korea,” chamber President Thomas Donohue said in a statement.

Daniel Ujczo, an Ohio-based international trade lawyer at the firm Dickinson Wright, said the tariff threat is purely about turning up the pressure in NAFTA talks and pleasing Mr. Trump’s protectionist supporters.

“The investigation into autos is pure pressure and politics. While the administration has discussed this since the 2016 campaign, it was launched only after it became clear NAFTA was at an impasse and the President was facing strong criticisms from his base on China,” Mr. Ujczo said.

Story continues below advertisement

With files from Daniel Leblanc

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter