Skip to main content

Parks Canada has rejected a proposed gondola to take skiers and hikers from the Banff townsite to the summit at the Mount Norquay ski resort.

The federal agency was considering a proposal by Liricon Capital, which owns the resort, to redevelop leased lands inside the Alberta mountain town and at the ski area in Banff National Park.

Officials with Parks Canada said they reviewed a feasibility study and other materials related to the proposal submitted in May 2018.

Story continues below advertisement

“There will not be further consideration of the proposed gondola, nor the proposed Grizzly Pavilion and boardwalks, which would be located on lands outside the Mount Norquay leasehold,” the agency said in a written statement to The Canadian Press.

“These components of the feasibility study do not conform with the agency’s policies on limits to development and ski area management in Banff National Park.”

The proposal by Liricon, which was supported by the Town of Banff, would have potentially closed the only access road to the ski hill and returned that land to Parks Canada. Visitors would have parked in new lots at Banff’s train station and ridden the gondola over the Trans-Canada Highway to the resort.

Parks Canada said that would have negatively affected public use of the Mount Norquay access road.

Jan Waterous, a partner at Liricon Capital, said the company is disappointed but will try again.

“We will be resubmitting a different proposal for ... consideration in the near term that addresses their concerns,” she said in an e-mail.

Waterous said the company remains confident that the project, along with some transit proposals, could be beneficial for the environment.

Story continues below advertisement

“Luckily, the science is on our side.”

An environmental study done for Liricon and posted online suggested the gondola was not likely to harm grizzly bears, wolves and cougars. It suggested further study was needed on bighorn sheep.

In its statement, Parks Canada said Banff National Park’s development plan and Parks Canada ski area management guidelines were put together with extensive public input and based on the best-available science and research.

“It is Parks Canada’s position that its policies on limits to development are fundamental to protecting the ecological integrity of Banff National Park and to ensure that this treasured place is preserved now and for future generations.

“Parks Canada is not willing to alter its policies to accommodate this proposal.”

Banff Mayor Karen Sorensen said the town respects Parks Canada’s decision.

Story continues below advertisement

“We know how important it is to work within the limits of development in Banff National Park,” she said in a statement.

Environmental groups welcomed the decision to reject the gondola, as well as the pavilion and boardwalks.

“We are pleased that Parks Canada ... is prioritizing nature and ecological integrity in the region,” said Katie Morrison, director of conservation for the southern Alberta chapter of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.

Reg Bunyan, who’s with the Bow Valley Naturalists, said the group hopes the parks agency also moves to limit the impact of traffic on the road by bringing in a dusk-to-dawn restriction.

The for-profit proposal wouldn’t have done enough to improve the wildlife corridors around the town of Banff, said Morrison.

“The extent of development in the proposal would have further compromised critical habitats and connectivity,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Liricon also wants to develop land to allow passenger rail service to Banff from Calgary.

In the statement, Parks Canada said the potential for a train connection would be subject to a separate review.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies