Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Mary Reid, professor of math education at the University of Toronto's Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, in Toronto on Dec. 8, 2017.

Christopher Katsarov/The Canadian Press

Graduating student teachers across Ontario will be scrambling to write a math proficiency test the provincial government is making available on Monday, following a months-long delay that has prevented would-be educators from clearing a final hurdle to securing their teaching licences.

Meanwhile, the agency directed by the government to develop the math test has removed a research review from its website that found standardized tests for educators do little to advance students’ achievement in the classroom.

Ontario would be the first province to require student teachers to pass a math test before getting their teaching licence. Australia and several jurisdictions in the United States mandate standardized teacher testing.

Story continues below advertisement

The province’s move to test teacher candidates on fractions, percentages and other math concepts has been controversial. The government has said that a teacher-competency test would be effective as more and more children struggled to meet the provincial standard in math.

However, research shows that teacher experience, the number of postsecondary math courses future teachers took and professional development were better ways to improve student performance. An August, 2019, literature review by the Education Quality and Accountability Office found that while compulsory teacher tests may receive support from policy makers, educators and the public, “the fundamental goal of these tests – to improve student learning – is often not met.”

The research review is no longer on the agency’s website.

Cameron Montgomery, chair of the EQAO, the agency tasked by the government with administering the test, said it was “a joint decision” to remove the research report, but the public can request a copy. He declined to comment on who made the decision, and said the research paper was “starting to be used for different reasons.”

The agency said it had been looking at how it would hold the test virtually, and only recently entered into an agreement with Colleges Ontario to administer it.

At least 70 per cent of the test will assess student teachers on content, including fractions, percentages and other arithmetic. The rest of the assessment will test them on how to teach the subject in the classroom.

EQAO is responsible for developing and scoring the test, said spokeswoman Sophie Auclair. The test will run from May 10 to August 13, she said.

Story continues below advertisement

In the meantime, many teachers who graduated last spring and have been teaching in classrooms were granted provisional teaching certificates. They will have to write the math test in order to continue teaching in the province.

Bella Lewkowicz graduated from the University of Ottawa last year and has been teaching French at the Catholic board. She said she and other graduates have been waiting for months to learn about the test, which was legislated in the fall of 2019.

Ms. Lewkowicz said she and other new teachers are worried that after “literally no word for over a year, and then all of a sudden with like 100 and some odd days to go before the expiration of our provisional licences, they drop everything about this test on us.”

Ms. Lewkowicz is part of a court challenge to have the test thrown out.

“I’m extraordinarily frustrated due to the lack of supports, due to the lack of information, the lack of guidance and the lack of potential preparation. It is a very frustrating time,” she said.

Caitlin Clark, a spokeswoman for Education Minister Stephen Lecce, said it was “unacceptable” that many elementary students are failing to meet provincial standards. “From the United Kingdom to Australia and Japan, a math standard for educators aligns with other leaders in math education,” she said, adding that the government has also updated the math curriculum for elementary school students./

Story continues below advertisement

Mary Reid, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto’s Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, said student teachers were told the test would be available last fall and the government kept changing the timeline. She said that several universities had started introducing courses that teach student teachers math basics, which the research shows is more valuable.

Prof. Reid said the test is adding to the stress teachers are feeling during the pandemic. Her department is looking to offer small group sessions and study guides.

“It is absolutely appalling and irresponsible for this government to impose a math proficiency test that is so high stakes,” she said. “It is such a short timeline. It is treating teachers with absolute disrespect.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies