Skip to main content

The Hong Kong Stock Exchanges on Oct. 8, 2019, formally dropped its bid to buy its London counterpart after the European exchange rejected the surprise offer.

Kin Cheung/The Associated Press

Hong Kong’s bourse on Tuesday scrapped its unsolicited $39 billion approach for London Stock Exchange Group (LSE) after failing to convince LSE management to back a move that could have transformed both global financial services giants.

Last month’s surprise cash-and-shares approach threatened to upend the LSE’s $27-billion plan to buy data and analytics firm Refinitiv. The Hong Kong exchange had said the LSE would have to ditch the Refinitiv purchase for its offer to go ahead.

LSE shares slid 6.1 per cent by 0805 GMT, close to their lowest since Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd (HKEX) announced its approach on Sept. 11, while the Hong Kong bourse’s stock was up 2.3 per cent near the end of its trading day.

Story continues below advertisement

HKEX chief executive Charles Li wrote in a blog post: “We still believe the strategic rationale for the combination of our two businesses is compelling and would create a world-leading market infrastructure group.”

“Despite a huge amount of work and discussions with a broad set of regulators and extensive shareholder discussions, the level of engagement from LSEG led us to conclude that the continued pursuit of a combination of the two businesses would not be in the best interests of our own shareholders.”

The LSE did not respond to a request for comment. Refinitiv is 45 per cent-owned by Thomson Reuters which owns Reuters News.

One LSE investor told Reuters it would have been “very, very hard to get the LSE board to engage as they rebutted the offer on grounds of strategy, not price.” The investor spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

Analysts had viewed HKEX’s chance of success as slim after it was rejected by the LSE just two days from the HKEX going public with its interest. Political turmoil engulfing Hong Kong and perceptions of Beijing’s growing influence over the city, were seen as another key obstacle to any deal.

Subsequent efforts by HKEX officials to engage with LSE shareholders had also met with resistance. Some investors told Reuters the HKEX would have to raise its offer by at least 20 per cent – mostly in cash – to tempt LSE shareholders.

“The price tag from the Hong Kong exchange perspective was getting a bit too high, so it’s good for the shareholders that they decided to walk away,” said Hao Hong, head of research at broker BOCOM International.

Story continues below advertisement

Since the HKEX went public with its interest in mid-September, its shares had fallen 8 per cent, compared with a 5 per cent drop in the Hang Seng benchmark index.

HONG KONG – WHAT NEXT?

The failure of the bold move leaves open the question of what Li might try next to fulfill the HKEX’s strategy of being “China-anchored and globally connected”.

The HKEX has been the world’s largest capital-raising venue in five of the past 10 years, but has been working to diversify its equities focus, launching a bond trading platform with China and buying the London Metal Exchange in 2012 for £1.4 billion(US$2.2-billion).

“HKEX will continue to try other things. Charles Li has done a lot of deals, most notably the London Metal Exchange. It may not be a stock exchange, but other related areas,” said Bocom’s Hong.

Under British takeover rules, the HKEX had until Oct. 9 to make a binding offer for LSE. The withdrawal of the approach means it cannot bid again for the LSE for at least six months unless the LSE’s management agreed to an offer, another group made a bid for the London exchange operator, or other events were deemed to be a material change in the LSE’s circumstances.

“If the Refinitiv deal surprisingly fails to get approval, I think we could see HKEX come again,” said China Galaxy Securities analyst Chi Man Wong.

Story continues below advertisement

“The (LSE) shareholder meeting (to approve the Refinitiv purchase) has been tentatively set for November but there is no firm date. If that deal fails then HKEX will be there.”

Analysts at Bank of America said investors had been worried that the HKEX’s pursuit of a deal could have led the exchange to raise fresh funds – weighing on the price of existing shares.

“We think there may still be questions as to why HKEX proposed the acquisition when it seemed somewhat challenging to bring to fruition, but we believe investors will likely focus more on the fundamentals of the company and the market in Hong Kong,” they said in a research note.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies