Skip to main content

Gordon Pape is editor and publisher of the Internet Wealth Builder and Income Investor newsletters.

I’ve received a number of inquiries recently about green bonds. These are fixed-income securities that are specifically intended to raise money for climate and environmental projects.

According to Investopedia, the World Bank issued the first official green bond in 2009. Last year, at least US$157-billion worth of these bonds were issued around the world. Some sources put the total even higher.

Story continues below advertisement

That’s a lot of money directed toward the environment. So why is it so hard for individual investors to get a piece of the action? John Cook, chief executive of Greenchip Financial, recently told us that, while the supply of green bonds is increasing, institutional investors are snapping up new issues and liquidity is poor.

There is no retail Canadian security that specializes in these bonds, but there are two U.S.-based exchange-traded funds to consider if you’re interested. Thanks to a reader for alerting us to them. Here are the details.

iShares Global Green Bond ETF (NDQ: BGRN)

Background: This fund invests in a portfolio of investment-grade global green bonds, where the use of proceeds is directly tied to promote climate or other environmental sustainability purposes through independent evaluation.

Performance: The fund was launched in November, 2018, and showed a one-year total rate of return of 6.83 per cent to the end of April. The year-to-date return as of May 21 was 1.59 per cent.

Distributions: The fund makes monthly distributions, the amount of which may vary considerably. The trailing 12-month distribution to May 1 was US$2.29, for a yield of 4.2 per cent at Friday’s closing price.

Portfolio: There are 383 positions in the portfolio. The majority of the holdings are European, with France accounting for 22.7 per cent of the assets, Germany 9.8 per cent and the Netherlands 8.1 per cent. About 10 per cent of the holdings are U.S. and 3.5 per cent Canadian. Some 12.4 per cent of the bonds are issued by supranational organizations, such as the World Bank.

The portfolio’s effective duration (a measure of risk) is 7.9 years. The longer the duration, the more vulnerable a bond or a fund is to interest rate movements.

Story continues below advertisement

Key metrics: This ETF has about US$75-million in assets under management. It’s lightly traded, with an average daily volume of 17,726 units. There are 1.4 million units outstanding. The net expense ratio is 0.2 per cent.

Tax status: Withholding tax of 15 per cent will apply on distributions to units held in a non-registered account, tax-free savings account or registered education savings plan. No tax will apply for registered retirement savings plans, registered retirement income funds or life income funds.

Price: The units closed on Friday at US$53.90.

VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (NYSE: GRNB)

Background: This ETF seeks to track the performance of the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index. It is comprised of U.S. dollar-denominated green bonds that are issued to finance environmentally friendly projects, and includes bonds issued by supranational, government and corporate issuers globally.

Performance: As of the end of April, the fund showed a one-year gain of 6.17 per cent and a three-year average annual compound rate of return of 3.49 per cent. The year-to-date gain at that point was 2.68 per cent.

Distributions: Payments are made monthly and may vary considerably. For the 12 months to May 21, the units paid 57.2 US cents. That’s a trailing yield of 2.1 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

Portfolio: This fund is much more heavily weighted to the United States, which accounts for 31.9 per cent of the assets. China is next at 15.4 per cent and supranational organizations account for just more than 13 per cent. So, the exposure is very different from the iShares fund, which focuses mainly on Europe. About 77 per cent of the assets are investment-grade.

The duration is 5.3 years, making this ETF less volatile than the iShares entry.

Key metrics: The fund was launched in March, 2017. Total assets are just less than US$32-million. There are 1.2 million units outstanding, with an average daily trading volume of only 6,163, so place a limit order if you decide to buy and be patient. The net expense ratio is 0.2 per cent.

Tax status: The same withholding rules apply as with the iShares fund.

Price: The units closed on Friday at US$27.22.

Conclusion: The VanEck fund has a longer track record and the returns to date are acceptable. Based on duration, it is also less exposed to interest rate movements than the iShares entry.

Story continues below advertisement

However, the iShares fund offers superior credit quality – just 0.29 per cent of the portfolio is unrated; the rest is BBB or higher with 55 per cent of the assets rated AAA or AA. And it has a better yield, based on the results of the past year.

On balance, my choice is the iShares fund.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies