Skip to main content

A Belgian study on male circumcision is sure to fuel the debate on the merits of this procedure.

Circumcised men reported less intense sexual pleasure and orgasm than uncircumcised men, according to the findings published in BJU International.

The researchers recruited 1,369 men over the age of 18 for the study by handing out leaflets in Belgium train stations. The men were asked to answer a series of questions and to rate the sensitive of their penis on a scale of 0 to 5. The uncircumcised men reported between 0.2 point and 0.4 points higher sensitivity.

Story continues below advertisement

"We're not saying less sexual activity or satisfaction, but sensitivity," senior researcher Dr. Piet Hoebeke from Ghent University Hospital told Reuters.

A survey of this type is not an ideal way to gather information on physical sensations. A better approach would be to bring the men into a lab and subject them to standardized stimuli and have them rate the experience.

Even if the survey is accurate, you have to asked if a difference of 0.2 to 0.4 on a scale of 5 really amounts to a lot. And the researcher acknowledged as much. "It's not a very big difference in sensitivity, but it's a significant difference," Hoebeke is quoted as saying.

Whatever the case, this is a polarizing issue. The procedure is an engrained part of numerous cultures and religions. Public health experts say the procedure can help reduce the spread of AIDS. But vocal opponent say that circumcision, when performed on an infant, is a form of child abuse.

Click here to read the full article by Reuters. Click here to read an abstract of the study.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies