Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Renée Zellweger is my celebrity look alike – or at least she was until last Tuesday. For years, people have told me I look like her. Same squinty-eyed smile and chipmunk cheeks, same stringy blonde hair and embarrassed smile that says, "Please stop staring at me, okay? Please? Hey look over there, it's Angelina Jolie!" The resemblance was apparently most striking when she was in London making the Bridget Jones movies and had gained enough weight to put her in the dreaded Hollywood category of "normal." Back then, people stopped me on the street and asked me how my relationship with the rock star Jack White was going. I'd just purse my lips, give them my best apologetic squint and ask that they please respect our privacy.

But my lookalike days came to an abrupt end this week when my facemate stepped out on the red carpet at the Elle Magazine Women in Hollywood Awards in L.A. after five years out of the limelight. Within minutes of the 45-year-old actress posing for cameras in a little black dress, the Internet exploded – mostly with vitriol – over the fact that her face had changed.

Imagine! A Hollywood actress changing her appearance! It's utterly outrageous and practically unheard of, isn't it? And yet this was how so many people felt. I'll admit I felt it too – and not just because it was our face she'd apparently cast off. Gawking at Zellweger (who looks very nice by the way, not at all puffed up or frozen stiff or otherwise cosmetically freakified – just a healthy, attractive 45-year-old woman who in no way resembles Renée Zellweger), I was reminded of my distress as a four-year-old when my father shaved his moustache. "Where's my Daddy? Give him back!" I supposedly shouted at the strange, naked-lipped stranger before bursting into tears.

Story continues below advertisement

When people change their faces beyond recognition, they seem to alter the very essence of themselves. This is irrational, of course, yet that's how we instinctively feel. The face tells us a lot – but we are overly invested in it.

There is, for instance, a widely accepted but entirely fictional belief in our culture that we can understand the inner workings of another human being by looking "deep into their eyes." We are still shocked when people lie "straight to our faces." Why the eyes and not the chest or the thumbs? Because human eyes – like a horse's ears – are particularly expressive. As countless facial-recognition studies have concluded, the brain's ability to recognize faces is centred around a visual response to the eye area. Humans are less able to identify the faces of others when this facial region is hidden. Hence, sunglasses are a good disguise.

But as we ought to know from watching any talented actor, the eyes are no more a window to the soul than the wrinkles on your palm are a map of the future.

Renée Zellweger's face, just like her body, is entirely her own and what she does with it is none of our business. Given that she's an actor, it should hardly be surprising (let alone galling) that she might wish to change her appearance to suit her craft. When she gained weight for the Bridget Jones series, after all, we collectively venerated her for it. So why the outcry over her face?

The answer is not, as some commentators have insisted, entirely to do with the raging sexism endured by female celebrities, though of course that's part of it. The main reason we are so upset by Zellweger's changed face is because she is no longer recognizable to us as a celebrity, and we can no longer cling to the delusion that we "know" her. All the emotional baggage we projected onto her famous squinty-eyed smile is suddenly revealed for what it really is: A complete waste of time and energy. It's our "Where's my Renée? Give her back!" moment.

In a wonderfully passive-aggressive statement released this week, Zellweger thanked the braying hoards of haters for "noticing" her changed appearance, saying it was all down to happiness and "healthy lifestyle changes," though she didn't mention what these were.

It's safe to assume she didn't mean to set fire to the collective unconscious and expose the emptiness of fame-worship by debuting her new look. But that is exactly what she has done. By simply changing her face, Renée Zellweger has engaged in a brilliant act of celebrity subversion – one that makes the entire artistic oeuvres of Lady Gaga and Marina Abramovic pale in comparison. With her new mug, she has offered us all a stark reminder of the fallacy of celebrity culture as a whole – the notion that we know these people just because we know what they look like. We just think we do, but only because we look at them so much.

Story continues below advertisement

And that, if you really think about it, is far more freaky and disturbing than any cosmetic procedure or "lifestyle change" could ever be.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies