Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Dan Werb, director of the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy, says side-by-side sales of cannabis and alcohol should not be permitted. But, society would benefit if more people substituted cannabis for alcohol. ‘Alcohol is a much more dangerous drug,‘ Mr. Werb says.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The B.C. government will decide later this month whether it wants to be the second jurisdiction in the world to allow cannabis and liquor to be sold side by side, a move that goes against the recommendations of Ottawa's own task force on legalization.

Last month, Solicitor-General Mike Farnworth announced the provincial government will be the lone wholesaler of recreational cannabis through the BC Liquor Distribution Branch and the drug will be sold by a mix of public and private retailers, a hybrid model much like the province's current system for alcohol.

But he left the door open to allowing cannabis to be sold inside the province's private and government-run liquor stores – an approach almost every province has rejected after hearing the concerns of most of the country's public-health experts.

Story continues below advertisement

So far, Nova Scotia is the only jurisdiction in the world that has signalled it will embrace such co-location. That province's justice minister told reporters last month that existing liquor retailers have the experience needed to sell restricted products while maintaining public safety. (None of the U.S. states that have legalized the drug have allowed it to be sold next to alcohol.)

The task force that guided Ottawa's hand on legalization set out its main concern over this approach in its final report released a year ago: Officials could be encouraging more people to use cannabis by selling it in the same place as alcohol because more than 80 per cent of adult Canadians consume alcohol compared to roughly 11 per cent who consumed cannabis in the past year.

"There is a significant risk of cannabis and cannabis advertising being introduced to a large number of Canadians who might not otherwise use cannabis," the task force stated in its final report, which also noted the concern over how mixing alcohol and cannabis leads to higher levels of intoxication. The panel's position against co-location was informed by a 2016 report from Canada's provincial and territorial health officers and the top medical officials from the country's 21 biggest cities.

But not everybody agrees that co-location is a bad policy move.

Cannabis was deemed less dangerous than tobacco in a 2010 British study that ranked 20 legal and illegal drugs based on the dependence, social and physical harms they caused. The report, published in the medical journal The Lancet, ranked tobacco as more harmful than cannabis, while both were considered far less dangerous to users and the general public than heroin, cocaine and alcohol.

Nova Scotia's Justice Minister Mark Furey told reporters last month that his province's government-run liquor stores have experience distributing potentially-dangerous products in a way that is socially responsible and ensuring it stays out of the hands of minors.

Dan Werb, director of the Toronto-based International Centre for Science in Drug Policy, warned against colocation, saying it could lead to the mixing of the two intoxicants or the potential that ongoing high levels of alcohol use will be supplemented by increased cannabis use. That's why people should have to go to two separate stores to buy cannabis and alcohol, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

"Alcohol is a much more dangerous drug – it's risk profile is a lot closer to cocaine than anything else," Dr. Werb said.

A working paper published in November by three American academics showed that sales of alcohol dropped 13 per cent over nearly a decade in states that had legalized medical cannabis. The researchers stated that – for some people – cannabis likely acts as a substitute for alcohol. That research, which is going through the peer-review process, follows other studies of states that have medical cannabis laws which show significant declines in overdoses on opioids, a class of legal and illicit painkillers that has led to a continuing crisis that has killed thousands of North Americans over the past year.

"If research like this shows that there is a potential substitutive effect and, if given the choice, some people would use cannabis more and alcohol less, then we should be doing everything in our power to amplify that effect," Dr. Werb said.

Paul Finch, treasurer at the B.C. Government and Service Employees' Union, which represents 73,000 government workers, including public liquor-store employees, said although no jurisdictions have allowed co-location so far, there are no credible scientific studies that show it is harmful. His union is working with The Alliance of Beverage Licensees, the trade group representing owners of the province's more than 600 private liquor stores, to lobby the government to embrace co-location.

Vancouver Councillor Kerry Jang, co-chair of B.C.'s committee of provincial bureaucrats and municipal politicians working toward its cannabis legislation, said the consensus among politicians from communities across the province is that cannabis should only be sold next to alcohol when a jurisdiction is too small or remote to support a store dedicated to selling the drug.

"They should be standalone pot shops like in every other province," he said.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this article was not clear in stating that Dan Werb is opposed to colocation.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies