Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

It is a tale of two provinces.

Quebec, highly indebted, is resolved to eliminate its deficit. Ontario, less highly indebted, is resolved to ignore its deficit problem.

On a per capita basis, Ontario's $12.5-billion deficit is much worse than Quebec's, at $3.2-billion. But whereas both the previous minority Parti Québécois government and the newly elected Liberal majority one pledged to balance Quebec's books within two years, Ontario's Liberal government couldn't appear to care less about the province's deteriorating fiscal situation, judging by Thursday's budget.

Story continues below advertisement

Assuming that Quebec does act, Ontario is thus about to become the weakest, fiscally, among the Canada's larger provinces. Sure, the Ontario Liberals have promised to balance the books in 2017-18. Those who believe that promise will be betting on the Toronto Maple Leafs for next year's Stanley Cup final. Obviously, the Liberals' polling has revealed that their voters, or those who might support them, care little or not at all about the deficit and want the government to avoid any tough spending decisions.

The Ontario government believes that a big injection of new infrastructure spending will create enough jobs and swell government coffers enough to bring down the deficit. Another Leafs bet.

There was a time a while back when Premier Kathleen Wynne seemed refreshingly prepared to tell the truth, when she said that infrastructure around Toronto should be paid for by those who use it, as in with tolls or taxes. But when the other party leaders – Progressive Conservative Tim Hudak and New Democrat Andrea Horwath – irresponsibly said that infrastructure could be paid for by eliminating wasteful spending or raising business taxes, Ms. Wynne lost the courage of whatever convictions she had.

An election might flow from this budget. This time, the province can do without the dance of the seven veils as Ms. Horwath strings the Premier along, extracting concessions in exchange for propping up the Liberals. Rather, Ms. Wynne should get defeated on the budget and have an election – in which, quite frankly, it would be hard to know for which party to vote.

The Liberals deserve to be defeated, if for no other reason than the reeking gas-plant scandal, but also for running the province into the fiscal ditch. (They have done very good things in health care and deserve credit for them.)

The Conservatives have taken on the sharp edge of the federal Harperites, and are therefore a "wedge" party rather than one that can appeal to a broad section of Ontarians. Mr. Hudak has not caught on with the public and is unlikely to do so. The party might do better if some voters, fed up with the Liberals, hold their noses and vote Conservative.

The Ontario NDP has become a nickel-and-dime party, tossing out silly little bribes to various segments of the electorate, a party without a vision.

Story continues below advertisement

If the province's voters are in despair, who can blame them?

With this budget, Ms. Wynne's Liberals did something rarely seen these days. They raised taxes on higher-income individuals, the aviation industry and tobacco, and to create an Ontario pension plan. And still they increased the deficit.

Most governments raise taxes to reduce a deficit, but this government raises taxes to spend more money. It's sort of the way Liberals governed federally and in Ontario some decades ago – this party really does deserve the label of "tax-and-spenders," because one senses they wear it with pride.

There was a lot of exaggerated rhetoric about Ontario's bright future in the budget, with all hard truths banished. Alas, Ontario's energy costs are rising sharply. Its auto industry is attracting relatively little investment. Its research and development record is average at best. Its big natural resource play (the northern "Ring of Fire") will be tied up for years or decades by aboriginal claims. Its manufacturing is hollowing out (with some notable exceptions). Its northern, southwestern and eastern (apart from Ottawa) regions are in rough shape, and now it has a rising debt burden.

Heading into a vote, Ms. Wynne's government decided to try to spend its way to re-election. It didn't make one hard decision, although these will eventually have to be made. Pity whichever government comes next – even if it's a Liberal one.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies