Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks during a meeting of the special committee on the COVID-19 outbreak, as efforts continue to help slow the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada May 20, 2020.

BLAIR GABLE/Reuters

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is suggesting the House of Commons could resume business during the COVID-19 pandemic using a “hybrid” model, in which some MPs are physically in the chamber while others participate virtually.

Mr. Trudeau suggested he is open to the idea Wednesday as the governing Liberals were in the midst of negotiations with the four main opposition parties to determine in what form Parliament may or may not return next week.

“I think there’s a lot of interest in a hybrid Parliament model where some people will be there in person, where others will call in via video-conferencing screens,” Mr. Trudeau said.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think there are ways of making it work and ensuring that MPs from every corner of the country get to participate and make sure their citizens are reflected in the debates that go on in Parliament and not just those who live in the National Capital Region.

“Obviously, these are discussions that continue, but there are models that are effective out there that we should look at adapting for Canadian use.”

He noted that the United Kingdom has adopted a hybrid model to keep its Parliament functioning during the pandemic.

Both the Conservatives and NDP are also promoting the idea of a hybrid Parliament.

As the Liberal government expands the financial supports designed to blunt the impact of the pandemic, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said his party wants more transparency on where those dollars are going.

He said that’s what is driving his party’s point of view in the talks about Monday’s scheduled return of the House of Commons, which has been largely adjourned since mid-March.

“We want to make sure that money that is being put out by the government goes directly to workers, that it is tied to jobs, that it is tied to employment,” Mr. Singh said. “To do that, we need to get back to a more normal operation of Parliament.”

Story continues below advertisement

A special COVID-19 committee has been sitting three times a week as a stand-in for normal Commons proceedings.

But the pause on normal proceedings is set to expire Monday, unless the four recognized parties in the House of Commons can come to some kind of agreement on how to extend it.

Mr. Singh said his party is still fine-tuning its proposal for the talks, but the New Democrats are eyeing a hybrid model similar to what is now being used in the U.K.

“The principle that we would want to operate on is that MPs are not limited from their access to representing their constituents so that they are able to be in some way representing their people, the people that elected them,” he said.

The Conservatives also support the hybrid approach, which Mr. Singh said has been presented as an option to the Speaker of the House of Commons.

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said he thinks a deal can be reached, but he has given the Liberals a list of demands before his party will agree to any modifications to the plan for Parliament.

Story continues below advertisement

He said Wednesday that his party is looking for improvements to a number of existing support programs, among them those that help with businesses’ fixed costs, as well as the commercial rent subsidy. He also wants the Canada Emergency Response Benefit and student-aid programs amended so recipients can also take jobs.

“We don’t want the government to say, ‘Oh yes, we’re going to do it,’ ” Mr. Blanchet said.

“We want the government to say, ‘This is what we’re going to do, this is when, this how, and this is how much it is going to cost.’ And in that case, we’ll say ‘OK, now you’re being true to your word.“’

Both the Commons and Senate have met several times to pass emergency aid legislation, doing so in single-day sittings with close to the minimum number of members required under the procedural rules of Parliament.

There are a handful of House of Commons committees still meeting as well, entirely virtually.

The current special committee meets twice a week virtually, and once in person.

Story continues below advertisement

A review of the minutes from the first six meetings reveals that Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer has attended three, while Mr. Trudeau, Mr. Singh and Mr. Blanchet have each attended four.

Mr. Blanchet said if MPs are going to continue in-person sittings, there needs to be enforcement of the number of MPs present to keep everyone safe.

He said his party isn’t committed to any particular approach for a return. He noted that there are about four more weeks of Parliament before the scheduled summer break, “so maybe the easier solution would be the best” – carrying on with the current thrice-weekly meetings of the special COVID-19 committee.

“I feel the easiest solution is making a strong and trustworthy agreement to go on as we do now, but if we do not, it’s pretty easy also to be here five days a week but in a very limited number of MPs.”

The Bloc is also demanding that Parliament make up the time it’s lost during the pandemic, sitting for at least four weeks during the summer. Mr. Trudeau did not rule out the idea Wednesday.

Canada and the United States have agreed to extend the closure of their shared border to all but essential crossings for at least another 30 days, into mid-June, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Tuesday. The Canadian Press

Sign up for the Coronavirus Update newsletter to read the day’s essential coronavirus news, features and explainers written by Globe reporters and editors.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies