Skip to main content

Protective Services Officers patrol along Melbourne's St. Kilda Beach on Nov. 8, 2020, as Victoria's state government announces an easing of restrictions.

WILLIAM WEST/AFP/Getty Images

Every morning in Melbourne, Jason Thompson waits with his heart in his throat for the official coronavirus count to come out.

On Friday, he was relieved to find that the state of Victoria, where Melbourne is located, had reached a milestone that many of his detractors thought was impossible. Victoria, which was the epicentre of Australia’s second wave, had gone 14 days without recording a single new case of COVID-19.

“It’s just a relief, really,” Dr. Thompson said. “People said we couldn’t get under five [and] that we’d be lucky to get under 10.”

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Thompson’s relief was especially profound because he led a controversial modelling effort that Victoria’s Premier, Daniel Andrews, held up as the reason the lockdown in Melbourne went on as long as it did.

How many coronavirus cases are there in Canada, by province, and worldwide? The latest maps and charts

Canada could hit 10,000 daily COVID-19 cases by December: Tam

Victoria eventually beat back the virus by testing widely, tracing contacts aggressively and enforcing some of the most Draconian restrictions in the democratic world. As Canada’s own second wave sweeps every province west of the Maritimes, there are lessons to be learned from the experience of Melbourne – even if it does enjoy the advantage of being in a temperate island country that doesn’t share the world’s longest land border with the United States.

Dr. Thompson, a senior researcher at the transport, health and urban design research lab at The University of Melbourne, developed the models with Rod McClure, dean of the faculty of medicine and health at the University of New England, north of Sydney.

Talking to them over Zoom is like taking a video call from a future that looks far brighter than Canada’s.

The second wave of COVID-19 exploded in Victoria, a state with about as many people as the Greater Toronto Area, in a manner similar to what’s happening in the GTA right now. After the virus spread from two quarantine hotels in Melbourne in May, it took off in the city’s poor, ethnically diverse suburban neighbourhoods where many residents can’t work from home.

The infection rate for Victoria spiked so quickly – from 73 new cases on July 1 to 598 a month later – that the Ontario government’s scientific advisers and modellers used it as a template for what steep, sharp growth of the province’s epidemic might look like.

On Oct. 29, Ontario’s modellers concluded growth had slowed, meaning the province was likely to avoid a Victoria-style spike. When the modellers weighed in again on Thursday, Toronto was seeing 88.5 new cases a week for every 100,000 residents, and neighbouring Peel Region 130.5 per 100,000, blowing by the rate of 63 weekly cases per 100,000 that Victoria logged at its peak in early August.

Story continues below advertisement

By Aug. 2, when Victoria widened the lockdowns to the rest of the state, Melburnians had already been living under stay-at-home orders since early July. Conditions were initially strictest at nine public-housing towers where residents, many of them immigrants, were under virtual house arrest.

Newly tightened restrictions in Melbourne permitted residents to go out for only an hour a day for exercise or necessary shopping, such as buying groceries, within five kilometres of home.

Essential workers received permits to be out. The government imposed a curfew from 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. A “ring of steel” made up of police checkpoints was erected around Melbourne. Police handed out on-the-spot fines of up to $1,652 (Australian), about $1,575 Canadian, for individuals and nearly $10,000 (Australian) for businesses that broke the rules. The fine for refusing to wear a mask was $200 (Australian).

“If you were out on the street, the police could stop you and check your address and check whether you had your work permit,” said Jodie McVernon, director of epidemiology at the Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne. “There were many, many fines. Every day in the news, we saw how many fines were issued.”

No more than two people could leave a home together; Dr. McVernon could go out with only one of her two teenage daughters at a time.

Human Rights Watch called police tactics during the lockdown “harsh” and “abusive,” citing examples such as the arrest of a pajama-clad pregnant woman in front of her children for trying to organize an anti-lockdown protest on Facebook. (Compare that with Canada’s hardest-hit province at the moment, where the chief public health officer tweeted this week: “Manitobans don’t need a law to do what is right – restrict your social interactions to your household. Not because you’ll be fined, but because it’s the right thing to do.”)

Story continues below advertisement

Despite their rigidity and punishing effect on the economy, a majority of Victorians backed the lockdown rules in August, according to public opinion research.

“Our protests were very, very modest,” said Catherine Bennett, chair of epidemiology at Deakin University in Victoria. “Even if [people] don’t always agree with the decisions being made, they understand that there are sacrifices to be made for the common good. That’s a fundamental difference, I think, from what we see in other democratic countries.”

Later in August, the state government asked Dr. Thompson and his team for the models and, based on their projections, established a timeline for when Victoria could safely end the containment measures.

Dr. Bennett said solidarity frayed as the lockdown dragged on through September and October. By that point, the number of new daily cases had fallen into the low single digits.

The model Dr. Thompson and his collaborators produced – which involved creating an “artificial society” and having a supercomputer determine what would happen if restrictions were altered in different ways and at different times – predicted the coronavirus would roar back by Christmas if the hammer were lifted before Victoria got to an average of fewer than five new cases a day over two weeks.

“What we were showing [to political leaders] was, 'if you make these decisions, you’re going to find yourself in a third wave in December, and essentially, your career is going to be over,” Dr. Thompson said.

Story continues below advertisement

He acknowledged there is no guarantee the wily coronavirus won’t slip in again. But he thinks achieving a long stretch of “zero COVID” would make it easier to catch.

In the meantime, Melburnians have emerged from their forced hibernation. The ring of steel has come down. Bars, cafés and pubs are open, with capacity limits, as are gyms. Premier Andrews’s approval rating is at 71 per cent. Most important, Australia, a country of 25 million, has recorded just 907 COVID-19 deaths, the majority in seniors' homes.

As of Thursday night, Canada, a country of 38 million, had reported 10,768 coronavirus deaths – and counting.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Dr. Theresa Tam say COVID-19 is on a runaway rise in most of the country as the seasons for both holidays and colds and flu approach. They say strict public health rules might help but nothing is more important than following those rules and being extra cautious about spreading contagion — especially if people hope to have any sort of gatherings at Christmas. The Canadian Press

Sign up for the Coronavirus Update newsletter to read the day’s essential coronavirus news, features and explainers written by Globe reporters and editors.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies