Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Downsview is an aging and thinly populated neighbourhood.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Toronto discovered some hidden treasure this week: 520 acres of land in Downsview, next to four mass-transit stations that could help absorb the city’s rapid growth.

But, remarkably, not everybody is happy about it. Local city councillor James Pasternak is raising concerns about whether a redevelopment of the site – which is important for the city – would be too much for Downsview.

Northcrest Developments, a subsidiary of the federal public-sector pension fund, and Canada Lands Corp. told The Globe and Mail they were teaming up to re-envisage their land at the former Downsview airport. This includes 370 acres, most of it empty, that now houses Bombardier Aerospace.

Story continues below advertisement

The developers have hired excellent designers and planners, led by the Danish firm Henning Larsen, and they want to build a district that mixes jobs, housing (including affordable housing), retail and recreation.

This sounds ideal. That mix is what planners call a “complete community," a basic objective of Toronto’s official plan.

So what’s the problem? The usual politics of development in Toronto, a city that has outdated planning policies and a general suspicion of the real estate industry – yet, also, a huge and growing shortage of housing.

The Downsview redevelopment would require changing zoning from “employment lands,” a category meant to make room for industry. Where you have these, you can’t have housing.

Mr. Pasternak is not pleased at the prospect of such a change. “The community doesn’t support residential intensification,” the councillor said by e-mail this week. “This is still an operating employment zone with aircraft manufacturing as its key industry.” He was referring to Bombardier, which makes planes here, but is committed to move out by 2023.

And after that? Other neighbourhood developments “are in process now,” he said. “We should make sure these are done right and in a respectful way to the local community before taking on any more. Our plates are full.”

In other words, the area can’t take more development.

Story continues below advertisement

That’s a remarkable assertion. Downsview is an aging and thinly populated neighbourhood. And population in Mr. Pasternak’s wider ward grew by just 5.7 per cent between 2011 and 2016; the downtown Ward 10 grew by 40 per cent in that time frame, and is still growing fast.

Toronto will add about a million people in the next generation. They have to live and work somewhere. The Downsview lands offer one such place – and a tremendous opportunity to build a 21st-century urban district, bordering three subway stations and a GO Transit station.

The promise of mixed uses is important. If you have housing, jobs, retail and services in the same neighbourhood, people can live their entire lives there. In Paris, the city’s mayor aims to create a 15-minute city, a place where everything you need from day to day is available within a quarter-hour walk from home. Vancouver is chasing the same thing. The benefits are many: building community, getting people out of cars and – especially in North America – reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

If a vast area is employment lands, none of those goals can be achieved.

Does this mean all employment lands zoning should disappear? No. Toronto will always need some manufacturing. But not enough, in one place, to fill a gigantic site such as Downsview.

“I don’t know what kinds of jobs you would attract to fill 500 acres if nobody lives there,” said Ken Greenberg, a prominent planner who is now advising Northcrest. “We’ve learned – not just in Toronto – that today’s jobs want to be in a mixed, synergistic environment.”

Story continues below advertisement

That environment doesn’t exist here yet. Canada Lands, a Crown corporation charged with managing the former military base, has done a mediocre job so far. They’ve alienated some neighbours in the process.

Downsview Park is underwhelming; the design vision by Bruce Mau and OMA that won a global competition in 2000 has been watered down. Canada Lands has built big boxes and the Stanley Greene Neighbourhood on the edge of the park; the latter is a car-dominated enclave without even a place to buy milk.

That’s no way to build a city. A new Downsview, well-planned and appropriately mixed up, is the place to think bigger.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies