Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Wall Street accountants and lawyers are trying to figure out new equity agreements to lure investors back to the blank-cheque company market after the U.S. regulator cracked down on the use of warrants, six industry executives told Reuters.

They are discussing jettisoning warrants issued by special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, in favour of rights agreements, or dramatically restructuring the warrants after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said many SPAC equity warrants should be considered liabilities.

The SEC’s surprise April announcement ground an already-slowing SPAC market to a halt as accountants and lawyers scrambled to figure out a fix with SEC staff, the people said.

Story continues below advertisement

SPACs are listed shell companies that raise cash to acquire and take public a private company, allowing targets to sidestep the stricter regulatory checks of an initial public offering.

“There are ongoing discussions between the auditing firms, the companies pressure-testing the SEC’s views,” said David Brown, a lawyer with Alston & Bird LLP. “Certainly those companies that haven’t IPO-ed yet are looking for potential workarounds.”

SPACs typically offer common stock with warrants attached when listing. While some star SPAC sponsors have been able to forgo warrants, most view the contracts as a key way to entice early investors who may have to lock up their cash for years.

The contracts grant SPAC sponsors and outside investors the right to buy common stock in the new entity created by the merger at a preagreed price, an attractive offer if the stock price rises. They also offer customized terms including anti-dilution protections and other provisions that mitigate potential losses.

But the SEC has taken issue with them in part because they often give some investors such as SPAC sponsors a better deal than public investors, the sources said. Retail investors in particular may struggle to understand the warrants’ complex terms or be unaware when they can redeem them, the SEC said.

Changing the classification means greater quarterly costs for the SPACs while they seek out targets and offers greater visibility into the fluctuations of their potential debts, sources said.

And warrants commonly have intricate pricing terms and provisions entitling holders to potential cash-payouts that are also more characteristic of debt than equity, the SEC said.

Story continues below advertisement

“The SEC may have been concerned sponsors were being enriched to a greater degree than other investors,” said Jeffrey Weiner, chief executive of auditor Marcum LLP, which handles more than 40 per cent of SPAC audit work, according to data from SPACInsider.

A record US$100-billion was raised by U.S. SPACs from the start of 2021 to March, according to data from Dealogic, when the market started to flag amid mounting regulatory scrutiny. There were 298 SPAC IPOs in the United States in the first three months of the year, but just 32 in April and May, according to data from Dealogic.

The SEC’s new position means SPACs, instead of making a one-time equity valuation, would have to account quarterly for the warrants as debt, a costly process that will potentially make them less attractive to targets and other investors.

Restructuring the contracts post-IPO is complex and many SPACs in that phase have few options but to reclassify the warrants as liabilities on their books, which many have done, according to accountants and public filings.

“Doing this assessment every quarter can be time consuming and costly,” said Angela Veal, a managing director with accounting firm EisnerAmper LLP.

ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTS

Sponsors looking to launch a SPAC IPO may have more options, said the Wall Street accountants and lawyers. They are trying to figure out an alternative instrument that would provide similar economic benefits as warrants and meet equity accounting treatment.

Story continues below advertisement

Rights agreements, equity contracts that also give investors the right to buy shares at a set price and date, are one alternative being considered, Mr. Weiner and others said.

Such contracts are commonly used by European companies to raise capital by offering shareholders a right to buy more stock, but it may not be possible to customize rights agreements as tightly as warrants to mitigate investor risks, the people said.

Some pre-IPO SPAC sponsors are removing or tweaking the loss-mitigation provisions and complex pricing terms in a bid to satisfy the equity accounting rules, a move that may make it harder to woo early investors, according to filings and the industry executives interviewed by Reuters.

The discussions between the industry and the SEC are continuing, the people said, and it was unclear the rights agreements or simpler warrant terms will fully address the SEC’s concerns.

An SEC spokesperson said agency staff “continue to make themselves available to consult on ... accounting questions to facilitate capital formation and protect investors.”

In the meantime, some SPACs focused on hot sectors are striking the warrants altogether. Last week, for example, venture investor Chamath Palihapitiya launched four biotech SPACs without warrants, in what is likely to be a major test of investor appetite.

Story continues below advertisement

Industry executives hope finding new terms or something to replace warrants will provide a jolt to the flagging SPAC market.

“It’ll pick up again, but not the same pace it was,” Marcum’s Mr. Weiner said.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies