Skip to main content

Pregnant woman holding baby booties.

RTimages/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Lindsay Lohan announced her pregnancy yesterday. So did Mila Kunis, declaring Ashton Kutcher is the dad. Sharon Osbourne also said a baby was on the way, at the age of 60. If you believed them, well, April Fools' on you. Ha ha.

Hollywire breathlessly announced the gags – at least by Kunis and Osbourne, calling them "epic," but really they were just lame and not very funny. (Except perhaps for Lohan's, which, despite feeling like a hoax even before she fessed up, was also more than a little disturbing.)

April Fools' Day came with some good gags this year – and we could be generous and say that these celebs are just taking knowing shots at our baby-bump obsessing cultural – but joking about being pregnant just feels like one lazy belly flop, so to speak. (Lohan couldn't even be bothered to make the noon deadline.) If that's the best you can do, why bother?

Story continues below advertisement

And it wasn't just celebrities: Fake sonograms were also trending in the general population. This site called "fake pregnancies" the bread and butter of April Fools', and wrote an Android app that creates a fake ultrasound when you wave your phone over someone's belly. (As the site also points out, if you fall for this you deserve to be pranked.)

This couple thought it would be just hilarious on April 1 last year to have their family joyfully welcome their news before declaring it a hoax – they then posted a video to YouTube, and you can see how well that went over. At least this mom produced an actual baby, when faking her water breaking became real water breaking.

Still, given how emotional a pregnancy can be – for good and bad – it seems to fall short of the fun of an April Fools' gag. Ultimately, faking a pregnancy is toying with a family member on a personal subject that good sense should put off-limits. It's enough to make you miss the good old-fashioned whoopee cushion.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies