Skip to main content
investor newsletter

Michael Pettis is a former investment banker and currently a professor of finance at the Peking University. In the most recent edition of Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast, the professor provided a description of China’s debt issues that Canadians can apply to their deliberations ahead of our national election.

Mr. Pettis explained that China is attempting to reorient its economy from investment-oriented to consumption-driven. The investment model was highly effective in generating gross domestic product growth in the 1980s and 1990s because China was under-invested.

The under-invested stage meant that hypothetically, business owners could borrow $100, invest it and create $110 in economic value. In these cases, the aggregate debt level rises, but the capacity to repay debt rises by 10 per cent.

The problem now, according to Mr. Pettis, is that a saturation point has been reached where $100 investments only create $20 in value. At this point, Chinese debt levels are exploding, but the unprofitable nature of recent investment means the economy’s debt burden is rapidly becoming unserviceable.

There are major structural differences between China’s economy and our own. Most importantly, Canada is already a modern, consumption-centric economy. Household debt levels are high, but anything resembling the gargantuan scale of China’s malinvestment is not evident.

Despite these economic distinctions, I don’t think Canadians can afford to fully ignore Mr. Pettis’ warnings for China as the federal election approaches. Sizeable budget deficits are expected no matter who wins on October 21, and the Liberals new spending initiatives are estimated to cost almost $30-billion annually according to the Globe and Mail’s Campbell Clark.

My point is certainly NOT that government spending is bad. In the past, I’ve featured the work of economists like Carlota Perez from the London School of Economics and University College London’s Mariana Mazzucato, who argue that the current era of technological proliferation requires more government intervention and safety nets for displaced workers.

Ideally, government spending should be focused in areas – education and infrastructure are the two most obvious - that provide benefits and financial returns over time frames longer than any private company is willing to wait. But they still, as Mr. Pettis emphasizes, need to eventually generate $110 in economic value for every $100 spent in aggregate or risk a general decline in standards of living. Canadians should keep this in mind as they head to the polls.

-- Scott Barlow, Globe and Mail market strategist

This is the Globe Investor newsletter, published three times each week. If someone has forwarded this e-mail newsletter to you or you’re reading this on the web, you can sign up for the newsletter and others on our newsletter signup page.

Stocks to ponder

WPT Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust This REIT closed at a record high on Friday and is uniquely positioned in its business, providing investors with exposure to the U.S. industrial market. Among its top tenants are well-known companies including General Mills, Unilever, Amazon, and Zulily. The REIT pays its unitholders a stable monthly dividend denominated in U.S. dollars. Jennifer Dowty profiles the REIT.

The Rundown

Sanity is seeping back into markets. And that could be a very good thing

From pot stocks and bitcoin to big U.S. IPOs, Fantasies are fading in many pockets of the market. The shift away from speculative investments can be read as a verdict on a slowing global economy. Look anywhere and you see evidence that smart money is growing skittish. Ian McGugan reports

Stock market shakeout: Big investors now shun the growth-at-all-costs model

For years, ambitious companies coming to market were rewarded for growth at all costs. But now, institutional money managers have started to demand positive cash flow and a visible path to profits – and these businesses struggle to show it. Tim Kiladze reports

The Globe’s guide for matching your ETFs to the right type of account to save on tax

Presenting the Globe and Mail’s ETF Tax Primer, aimed at helping you find the best possible home for your ETF. Designed to be used with The Globe’s ETF Buyer’s Guide, it outlines the tax implications of investing in bond funds and Canadian, U.S. and international equity funds in a TFSA, a registered retirement savings plan or registered retirement income fund, or a taxable account.

Others (for subscribers)

Monday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades

Monday’s Insider Report: Two stocks yielding over 4% with buying action

Stocks out of favour again as global funds prefer bonds in September: poll

Globe Advisor

Are you a financial advisor? Register for Globe Advisor (www.globeadvisor.com) for free daily and weekly newsletters, in-depth industry coverage and analysis, and access to ProStation - a powerful tool to help you manage your clients’’ portfolios.

Ask Globe Investor

Question: I plan to retire soon and will qualify for the full CPP pension at 65. How much higher is the benefit if I wait until the age of 70, and how long would I have to live for that option to make sense?

Answer: If you delay taking your CPP until the age of 70, it will increase by 42 per cent compared with the amount you would receive at the age of 65 – even if you’re not working during those years. That is because any months or years of zero earnings after the age of 65 can be dropped out during the CPP calculation, in addition to the general 17-per-cent dropout applied to years before 65. Ignoring inflation and the investment opportunity of taking your CPP at 65, you will be better off by delaying until the age of 70 as long as you live until at least 82. If you are in poor health and have a shorter life expectancy than 82, that would tilt the decision toward taking CPP sooner.

--John Heinzl

Do you have a question for Globe Investor? Send it our way via this form. Questions and answers will be edited for length.

What’s up in the days ahead

Remember that little old stock called Nutrien (a.k.a. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan)? David Berman sure does, and he’ll report on what the company has been up to - and why it might be a good time to consider it for your portfolio.

Click here to see the Globe Investor earnings and economic news calendar.

More Globe Investor coverage

For more Globe Investor stories, follow us on Twitter @globeinvestor

Click here share your view of our newsletter and give us your suggestions.

You may also be interested in our Market Update or Carrick on Money newsletters. Explore them on our newsletter signup page.

Compiled by Globe Investor Staff

Follow related authors and topics

Authors and topics you follow will be added to your personal news feed in Following.

Interact with The Globe